To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Performance of creatinine-based equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate with a methodology adapted to the context of drug dosage adjustment
Department of Nephrology-Dialysis-Transplantation, University of Liège (ULg CHU), CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium; Department of Nephrology-Dialysis-Apheresis, Hopital Universitaire Caremeau, Nimes, France.
Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Clinical Studies Sweden, Forum South, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Physiology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, INSERM, Paris, France.
CHU de Bordeaux, Nephrologie - Transplantation - Dialyse, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS-UMR 5164 Immuno ConcEpT, France.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, ISSN 0306-5251, E-ISSN 1365-2125, Vol. 88, no 5, p. 2118-2127Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIM: The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) creatinine-based equation is still used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for drug dosage adjustment. Incorrect eGFR may lead to hazardous over- or underdosing METHODS: In a cross-sectional analysis, CG was validated against measured GFR (mGFR) in 14,804 participants and compared with the Modification-of-Diet-in-Renal-Diseases (MDRD), Chronic-Kidney-Disease-Epidemiology (CKD-EPI), Lund-Malmö-Revised (LMR), and European-Kidney-Function-Consortium (EKFC) equations. Validation focused on bias, imprecision, and accuracy (percentage of estimates within ±30% of mGFR, P30), overall and stratified for mGFR, age, and body mass index at mGFR <60 mL/min, as well as classification in mGFR stages.

RESULTS: The CG equation performed worse than the other equations, overall and in mGFR, age and BMI subgroups in terms of bias (systematic overestimation), imprecision and accuracy except for patients ≥65 years where bias and P30 were similar to MDRD and CKD-EPI, but worse than LMR and EKFC. In subjects with mGFR<60 mL/min and at BMI [18.5-25[kg/m2 , all equations performed similarly and for BMI<18.5kg/m2 CG and LMR had the best results though all equations had poor P30-accuracy. At BMI≥25kg/m2 the bias of the CG increased with increasing BMI (+17.2mL/min at BMI≥40kg/m2 ). The four more recent equations also classified mGFR stages better than CG.

CONCLUSIONS: The CG equation showed poor ability to estimate GFR overall and in analyses stratified for GFR, age, and BMI. CG was inferior to correctly classify the patients in the mGFR staging compared to more recent creatinine-based equations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc., 2022. Vol. 88, no 5, p. 2118-2127
Keywords [en]
Chronic kidney disease, drug adjustment, glomerular filtration rate
National Category
Urology and Nephrology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-95277DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15132ISI: 000725543800001PubMedID: 34709683Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85120415018OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-95277DiVA, id: diva2:1607130
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2019-00198Available from: 2021-10-29 Created: 2021-10-29 Last updated: 2022-05-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Sundin, Per-Ola

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sundin, Per-Ola
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Urology and Nephrology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 62 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf