To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Serial NIRS-IVUS Assessment of Changes in Coronary Lumen Area During 2-Year Follow-Up: Insights From the PROSPECT ABSORB Trial
Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA.
Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA.
Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Washington, DC, USA.
Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, ISSN 0735-1097, E-ISSN 1558-3597, Vol. 78, no 19 Suppl., p. B35-B36Article in journal, Meeting abstract (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: In PROSPECT II, 182 patients with plaque burden (PB) ≥ 65% were randomized to bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) + guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) versus GDMT alone. Protocol-directed 3-vessel near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-IVUS was repeated at 25 months.

Methods: Excluding lesions treated by BVS, paired (baseline and follow-up) NIRS-IVUS was available in 626 nonculprit lesions in 165 patients. Follow-up minimum lumen area (MLA) and the corresponding baseline sites were measured: rapid lesion progression (RLP) was a ≥ 0.5 mm2 decrease of MLA, and rapid lesion regression (RLR) was a ≥ 0.5 mm2 increase of MLA.

Results: RLP occurred in 34.5%, RLR occurred in 15.5%, and 49.8% had “no change.” The % change in vessel area correlated with the % change of plaque area (r = 0.81, P < 0.001), demonstrating vessel remodeling (Figure 1). At baseline, the RLP lesions had larger plaque areas, longer lesions, and higher prevalence of lipid-rich plaque (maxLCBI4mm ≥ 324.7). During follow-up, 80.2% of RLP lesions had negative remodeling irrespective of the change in plaque area, whereas 76.3% of RLR lesions had a decrease in plaque area irrespective of negative or positive remodeling. In lesions without change in lumen area, there were compensatory changes in plaque and vessel areas.

Conclusion: In stabilized patients post-MI treated with GDMT, half of untreated non–flow- limiting lesions had significant lumen changes at 25 months, with RLP twice as frequent as RLR. The predominant mechanism of RLP was negative vessel remodeling whereas the predominant mechanism of RLR was reduction in plaque area.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2021. Vol. 78, no 19 Suppl., p. B35-B36
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-95498ISI: 000715526900078OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-95498DiVA, id: diva2:1612616
Conference
33rd Annual Symposium Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT 2021), Orange County Convention Center, Orlando, Florida, USA, November 4-6, 2021
Available from: 2021-11-18 Created: 2021-11-18 Last updated: 2025-02-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Fröbert, Ole

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fröbert, Ole
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 13 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf