To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Colombian Experience in Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA): The Progression From a Large Caliber to a Low-Profile Device at a Level I Trauma Center
Fundación Valle del Lili, Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, W Midlands, England.
Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston Texas, USA.
Department of Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Shock, ISSN 1073-2322, E-ISSN 1540-0514, Vol. 56, no 1S, p. 42-45Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is now performed in many trauma centers, it is used at more than 250 hospitals in the United States and there is an increase rate of publications with the experience in these centers, but there is a gap of knowledge regarding the use of REBOA in Latin-America. This paper endeavors to describe the utilization of REBOA at a high level Latin-American Trauma Center and the transition from a large caliber to a low-profile device with the concomitant reduction in the groin access complications.

Methods: A prospective, observational, single-center study was conducted. We included all trauma patients who underwent REBOA. We recorded data from admission parameters, complications, and clinical outcomes.

Results: Fifty patients were included. Most of the REBOA catheters were inserted in the operating room [47 (94%)], and the arterial access was done by surgical cutdown [40 (80%)]. All the complications were associated with the catheter of 11 Fr Sheath used in 36 patients [n = 8/36 (22%) vs. n = 0/14 (0%); P = 0.05].

Conclusion: REBOA can be used safely in blunt or penetrating thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic trauma. The insertion of a 7 Fr Sheath was associated with lower complications, so its use should be preferred over larger calibers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2021. Vol. 56, no 1S, p. 42-45
Keywords [en]
Catheter insertion, groin access, severe trauma
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-95733DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001515ISI: 000720520000009PubMedID: 31977958OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-95733DiVA, id: diva2:1616666
Available from: 2021-12-03 Created: 2021-12-03 Last updated: 2024-03-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Hörer, Tal M.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hörer, Tal M.
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Shock
Anesthesiology and Intensive CareSurgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 31 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf