To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Important interventions in the operating room to prevent bacterial contamination and surgical site infections
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. University Health Care Research Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0435-8424
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7862-3652
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. University Health Care Research Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9002-6145
2022 (English)In: American Journal of Infection Control, ISSN 0196-6553, E-ISSN 1527-3296, Vol. 50, no 9, p. 49-1054Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The aim of this study was to explore interventions that Swedish operating room (OR) nurses considered important for the prevention of bacterial contamination and surgical site infections (SSIs).

Methods: A web-based cross-sectional survey with an open-ended question was answered by OR nurses and analyzed using summative content analysis and descriptive statistics.

Results:The OR nurses (n=890) worked within 11 surgical specialties and most of them worked at university hospitals (37%) or county hospitals (53%). The nurses described twelve important interventions to prevent bacterial contamination and SSI: skin disinfection (25.9%), the OR environment (18.2%), aseptic technique (16.4%), OR clothes (13.4%), draping (9.8%), preparation (6.1%), dressing (3.6%), basic hygiene (3.4%), normothermia (2.1%), communication (0.7%), knowledge (0.3%), and work strategies (0.2%).

Discussion: Skin disinfection was considered the most important intervention in order to prevent bacterial contamination and SSI. The responses indicated that many nurses believed the patients’ skin to be sterile after the skin disinfection process. This is not a certainty, but skin disinfection does significantly decrease the amount of bacterial growth.

Conclusions: This study shows that many OR nurses' interventions are in line with recommendations. Although, knowledge regarding the effect of skin disinfection needs further research and continued education.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 50, no 9, p. 49-1054
Keywords [en]
Infection control, Perioperative, Surgical preparation, Infection prevention, Cross-infection
National Category
Nursing Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-96260DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.12.021ISI: 000863173100013PubMedID: 34971709Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85123204909OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-96260DiVA, id: diva2:1624807
Note

Funding agency:

Research Committee of Region Örebro County, Sweden

Available from: 2022-01-05 Created: 2022-01-05 Last updated: 2022-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Wistrand, CamillaFalk-Brynhildsen, KarinSundqvist, Ann-Sofie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wistrand, CamillaFalk-Brynhildsen, KarinSundqvist, Ann-Sofie
By organisation
School of Health SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
American Journal of Infection Control
NursingSurgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 240 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf