To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Swedish version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument for use in an operating room context (APUP-OR): A nationwide psychometric evaluation
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7862-3652
Skin Integrity Research Group (SKINT), University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Belgium.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3517-5711
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. University Health Care Research Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0435-8424
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of Tissue Viability, ISSN 0965-206X, Vol. 31, no 1, p. 46-51Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: To assess operating room (OR) nurses' attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention, the Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention (APuP) instrument was developed.

Aim: The aim of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention (APuP) instrument in a Swedish OR context.

Materials and methods: A psychometric evaluation study was conducted, using a convenience sample, between February and August 2020. Validity (content, construct, discriminatory power) and reliability (stability and internal consistency) were evaluated.

Results: The first survey (test) was completed by 284 Swedish OR nurses, of whom n = 50 (17.6%) completed the second survey (retest). A Principal Component Analysis was conducted for the 13-item instrument. The KMO value for this model was 0.62. Bartlett's test for sphericity was statistically significant (p 0.001). Five factors were identified which accounted for 56% of the variance in responses related to attitudes toward pressure ulcer prevention. The Cronbach's α for the instrument "attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention" was 0.66. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.49 (95% CI = 0.25-0.67).

Conclusion: This Swedish version of the APuP- OR is the first step in the development of an instrument to measure OR nurses' attitudes towards PU prevention in a Swedish OR context. The reliability of the instrument was low and the validity moderate. A larger sample and the revision or addition of items related to the context of the operating room should be considered in order to confirm aspects of the psychometric properties.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 31, no 1, p. 46-51
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-96261DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.12.005ISI: 000754396300007PubMedID: 34969580Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85122136342OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-96261DiVA, id: diva2:1624817
Available from: 2022-01-05 Created: 2022-01-05 Last updated: 2024-03-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Falk-Brynhildsen, KarinWistrand, CamillaGifford, MervynBeeckman, Dimitri

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falk-Brynhildsen, KarinRaepsaet, CharlotteWistrand, CamillaGifford, Mervynvon Vogelsang, Ann-ChristinBeeckman, Dimitri
By organisation
School of Health SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 69 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf