Prehabilitation, enhanced recovery after surgery, or both? A narrative review
2022 (English) In: British Journal of Anaesthesia, ISSN 0007-0912, E-ISSN 1471-6771, Vol. 128, no 3, p. 434-448Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
This narrative review presents a biological rationale and evidence to describe how the preoperative condition of the patient contributes to postoperative morbidity. Any preoperative condition that prevents a patient from tolerating the physiological stress of surgery (e.g. poor cardiopulmonary reserve, sarcopaenia), impairs the stress response (e.g. malnutrition, frailty), and/or augments the catabolic response to stress (e.g. insulin resistance) is a risk factor for poor surgical outcomes. Prehabilitation interventions that include exercise, nutrition, and psychosocial components can be applied before surgery to strengthen physiological reserve and enhance functional capacity, which, in turn, supports recovery through attaining surgical resilience. Prehabilitation complements Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care to achieve optimal patient outcomes because recovery is not a passive process and it begins preoperatively.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 128, no 3, p. 434-448
Keywords [en]
Enhanced recovery pathway, fast-track, injury, nutrition, perioperative, prehabilitation, preoperative, stress response, surgical risk
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-96406 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.12.007 ISI: 000761787900025 PubMedID: 35012741 Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85122530609 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-96406 DiVA, id: diva2:1626968
Note Corrigenum epub ahead of print in British Journal of Anaesthesia, 15 March 2022.
Corrigendum to ‘Prehabilitation, enhanced recovery after surgery, or both? A narrative review’ (Br J Anaesth 2022; 128: 434-48)Author links open overlay. Chelsia Gillis, Olle Ljungqvist, Francesco Carli. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.001
2022-01-122022-01-122022-03-23 Bibliographically approved