To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prehabilitation, enhanced recovery after surgery, or both? A narrative review
Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2636-4745
Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
2022 (English)In: British Journal of Anaesthesia, ISSN 0007-0912, E-ISSN 1471-6771, Vol. 128, no 3, p. 434-448Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This narrative review presents a biological rationale and evidence to describe how the preoperative condition of the patient contributes to postoperative morbidity. Any preoperative condition that prevents a patient from tolerating the physiological stress of surgery (e.g. poor cardiopulmonary reserve, sarcopaenia), impairs the stress response (e.g. malnutrition, frailty), and/or augments the catabolic response to stress (e.g. insulin resistance) is a risk factor for poor surgical outcomes. Prehabilitation interventions that include exercise, nutrition, and psychosocial components can be applied before surgery to strengthen physiological reserve and enhance functional capacity, which, in turn, supports recovery through attaining surgical resilience. Prehabilitation complements Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care to achieve optimal patient outcomes because recovery is not a passive process and it begins preoperatively.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 128, no 3, p. 434-448
Keywords [en]
Enhanced recovery pathway, fast-track, injury, nutrition, perioperative, prehabilitation, preoperative, stress response, surgical risk
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-96406DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.12.007ISI: 000761787900025PubMedID: 35012741Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85122530609OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-96406DiVA, id: diva2:1626968
Note

Corrigenum epub ahead of print in British Journal of Anaesthesia, 15 March 2022.

Corrigendum to ‘Prehabilitation, enhanced recovery after surgery, or both? A narrative review’ (Br J Anaesth 2022; 128: 434-48)Author links open overlay. Chelsia Gillis, Olle Ljungqvist, Francesco Carli. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.001

Available from: 2022-01-12 Created: 2022-01-12 Last updated: 2022-03-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ljungqvist, Olle

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ljungqvist, Olle
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 43 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf