To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Agreement of the modified Medical Research Council and New York Heart Association scales for assessing the impact of self-rated breathlessness in cardiopulmonary disease
Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Dept of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund, Sweden.
Dept of Neuroscience, Physiotherapy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Dept of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Dept of Respiratory Medicine.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1926-8464
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: ERJ Open Research, E-ISSN 2312-0541, Vol. 8, no 1, article id 00460Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The functional impact of breathlessness is assessed using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale for chronic respiratory disease and with the New York Heart Association Functional Classification (NYHA) scale for heart failure. We evaluated agreement between the scales and their concurrent validity with other clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes in cardiorespiratory disease.

Methods: Outpatients with stable chronic respiratory disease or heart failure were recruited. Agreement between the mMRC and NYHA scales was analysed using Cramér's V and Kendall's tau B tests. Concurrent validity was evaluated using correlations with clinically relevant measures of breathlessness, anxiety, depression, and health-related quality of life. Analyses were conducted for all participants and separately in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure.

Results: In a total of 182 participants with cardiorespiratory disease, the agreement between the mMRC and NYHA scales was moderate (Cramér's V: 0.46; Kendall's tau B: 0.57) with similar results for COPD (Cramér's V: 0.46; Kendall's tau B: 0.66) and heart failure (Cramér's V: 0.46; Kendall's tau B: 0.67). In the total population, the scales correlated in similar ways to other patient-reported outcomes.

Conclusion: In outpatients with cardiorespiratory disease, the mMRC and NYHA scales show moderate to strong correlations and similar associations with other patient-reported outcomes. This supports that the scales are comparable when assessing the impact of breathlessness on function and patient-reported outcomes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
European Respiratory Society , 2022. Vol. 8, no 1, article id 00460
National Category
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-96879DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00460-2021ISI: 000783165900019PubMedID: 35083321Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85121781549OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-96879DiVA, id: diva2:1633256
Funder
Swedish Heart Lung FoundationSwedish Research Council, 2019-02081Swedish Society for Medical Research (SSMF)
Note

Funding agency:

Swedish Respiratory Society

Available from: 2022-01-28 Created: 2022-01-28 Last updated: 2024-01-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Sundh, Josefin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sundh, Josefin
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
ERJ Open Research
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 171 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf