To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade.
Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pathology Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Urology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5533-7899
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Clinical Epidemiology, E-ISSN 1179-1349, Vol. 14, p. 59-70Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revised the Gleason system in 2005 and 2014. The impact of these changes on prostate cancer (PCa) prognostication remains unclear.

Objective: To evaluate if the ISUP 2014 Gleason score (GS) predicts PCa death better than the pre-2005 GS, and if additional histopathological information can further improve PCa death prediction.

Patients and Methods: We conducted a case-control study nested among men in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden diagnosed with non-metastatic PCa 1998-2015. We included 369 men who died from PCa (cases) and 369 men who did not (controls). Two uro-pathologists centrally re-reviewed biopsy ISUP 2014 Gleason grading, poorly formed glands, cribriform pattern, comedonecrosis, perineural invasion, intraductal, ductal and mucinous carcinoma, percentage Gleason 4, inflammation, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and post-atrophic hyperplasia. Pre-2005 GS was back-transformed using i) information on cribriform pattern and/or poorly formed glands and ii) the diagnostic GS from the registry. Models were developed using Firth logistic regression and compared in terms of discrimination (AUC).

Results: The ISUP 2014 GS (AUC = 0.808) performed better than the pre-2005 GS when back-transformed using only cribriform pattern (AUC = 0.785) or both cribriform and poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.792), but not when back-transformed using only poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.800). Similarly, the ISUP 2014 GS performed better than the diagnostic GS (AUC = 0.808 vs 0.781). Comedonecrosis (AUC = 0.811), HGPIN (AUC = 0.810) and number of cores with ≥50% cancer (AUC = 0.810) predicted PCa death independently of the ISUP 2014 GS.

Conclusion: The Gleason Grading revisions have improved PCa death prediction, likely due to classifying cribriform patterns, rather than poorly formed glands, as Gleason 4. Comedonecrosis, HGPIN and number of cores with ≥50% cancer further improve PCa death discrimination slightly.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Dove Medical Press Ltd. , 2022. Vol. 14, p. 59-70
Keywords [en]
Gleason score, histopathology, prognosis, prognostic markers, prostate cancer, virtual microscopy
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-96822DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S339140ISI: 000746037800002PubMedID: 35082531Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85123826548OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-96822DiVA, id: diva2:1633553
Funder
ProstatacancerförbundetSwedish Cancer Society, 2011/825
Note

Funding agencies:

Strategic Research Programme in Epidemiology at Karolinska Institutet

Strategic Research Programme in Cancer at Karolinska Institutet

Sardinian Regional Authority (the DIFRA Project)

Available from: 2022-01-31 Created: 2022-01-31 Last updated: 2025-02-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Carlsson, JessicaDavidsson, SabinaAndrén, Ove

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Carlsson, JessicaDavidsson, SabinaAndrén, Ove
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Clinical Epidemiology
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf