Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade.Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Clinical Epidemiology, E-ISSN 1179-1349, Vol. 14, p. 59-70
Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revised the Gleason system in 2005 and 2014. The impact of these changes on prostate cancer (PCa) prognostication remains unclear.
Objective: To evaluate if the ISUP 2014 Gleason score (GS) predicts PCa death better than the pre-2005 GS, and if additional histopathological information can further improve PCa death prediction.
Patients and Methods: We conducted a case-control study nested among men in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden diagnosed with non-metastatic PCa 1998-2015. We included 369 men who died from PCa (cases) and 369 men who did not (controls). Two uro-pathologists centrally re-reviewed biopsy ISUP 2014 Gleason grading, poorly formed glands, cribriform pattern, comedonecrosis, perineural invasion, intraductal, ductal and mucinous carcinoma, percentage Gleason 4, inflammation, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and post-atrophic hyperplasia. Pre-2005 GS was back-transformed using i) information on cribriform pattern and/or poorly formed glands and ii) the diagnostic GS from the registry. Models were developed using Firth logistic regression and compared in terms of discrimination (AUC).
Results: The ISUP 2014 GS (AUC = 0.808) performed better than the pre-2005 GS when back-transformed using only cribriform pattern (AUC = 0.785) or both cribriform and poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.792), but not when back-transformed using only poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.800). Similarly, the ISUP 2014 GS performed better than the diagnostic GS (AUC = 0.808 vs 0.781). Comedonecrosis (AUC = 0.811), HGPIN (AUC = 0.810) and number of cores with ≥50% cancer (AUC = 0.810) predicted PCa death independently of the ISUP 2014 GS.
Conclusion: The Gleason Grading revisions have improved PCa death prediction, likely due to classifying cribriform patterns, rather than poorly formed glands, as Gleason 4. Comedonecrosis, HGPIN and number of cores with ≥50% cancer further improve PCa death discrimination slightly.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Dove Medical Press Ltd. , 2022. Vol. 14, p. 59-70
Keywords [en]
Gleason score, histopathology, prognosis, prognostic markers, prostate cancer, virtual microscopy
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-96822DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S339140ISI: 000746037800002PubMedID: 35082531Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85123826548OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-96822DiVA, id: diva2:1633553
Funder
ProstatacancerförbundetSwedish Cancer Society, 2011/825
Note
Funding agencies:
Strategic Research Programme in Epidemiology at Karolinska Institutet
Strategic Research Programme in Cancer at Karolinska Institutet
Sardinian Regional Authority (the DIFRA Project)
2022-01-312022-01-312025-02-18Bibliographically approved