To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Casting light on citizens’ conceptions of what is ‘political’
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3136-7898
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7784-8996
Department of Political Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, USA.
2023 (English)In: Acta Politica, ISSN 0001-6810, E-ISSN 1741-1416, Vol. 58, no 1, p. 57-78Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Existing studies suggest that what people do and do not think of as being ‘politics’, varies a lot. Some citizens embrace narrow understandings, regarding only few issues as ‘political’. While others hold broad conceptions. What remains unclear is to what extent citizens agree on the contents, i.e., which topics are ‘political’. Using representative survey data from the U.S. (N = 1000), this article illustrates the over -laps and differences in conceptions of politics that different groups of citizens hold. Specifically, the results of a cluster analysis reveal five groups. The citizens within each group share similar conceptions of politics, while across groups conceptions differ. We find one group considering everything as political, one not regarding anything as such, and a third one identifying only tax-cuts as ‘political’. In between these extremes, two groups identify politics in terms of rather demarcated spheres of issues: domestic, or cross-border/global issues. Further analyses point to important differences in the groups’ socio-demographic profiles, political interest, and political behaviors. This shows, in their minds, people draw boundaries around politics in quite varied, yet principled, ways. This comes with a meaningful diversity in citizens’ connection to the political world around them, and with important implications for their roles within it.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Palgrave Macmillan, 2023. Vol. 58, no 1, p. 57-78
Keywords [en]
Conceptions of politics, Political interest, Political participation, Political inequality, Political culture, SES
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-97490DOI: 10.1057/s41269-022-00233-yISI: 000754350800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85124553767OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-97490DiVA, id: diva2:1637709
Note

Funding agency:

Örebro University

Available from: 2022-02-14 Created: 2022-02-14 Last updated: 2024-05-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. What is Politics? Perspectives on the variations, origins, and consequences of citizens' conceptions of politics
Open this publication in new window or tab >>What is Politics? Perspectives on the variations, origins, and consequences of citizens' conceptions of politics
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

What is politics according to citizens? This thesis centers around that question and seeks to contribute to our understanding of citizens’ conceptions of politics. It discusses and investigates variations in, origins of, and consequences of con-ceptions of politics.

The theoretical perspectives direct interest to three levels of politics. The first concerns the political macro-level and political culture. The second takes an in-terest in the meso-level of politics and different subcultures. The third focuses on the micro-level, more specifically on individual citizens’ political participation.

Empirically, the thesis rests on three studies, based on two sets of survey data collected in Sweden and the U.S. The data sets from each country are fairly rep-resentative to the larger populations.

On citizens’ conceptions of politics - the disagreements found among scholars over the meaning of politics seem to be present among the public as well. There is no unified understanding of what politics is. The notions citizens have on the matter vary both in terms of breadth (how much of the social world they catego-rize as politics) and of content (the composition of phenomena they understand to be politics). In both countries examined in this thesis, some groups regardalmost nothing as political. At the same time, at the other end of the spectrum,there are groups whose conception of politics is so broad that it covers almost everything. Several other groups can also be discerned between these two ex-tremes.

On the origins of citizens’ differing conceptions of politics - several factorsseem to influence conceptions of politics, such as SES and demographic back-ground. Attitudinal orientations appear to have an impact as well. One factor, however, stands out: people’s interest in politics. People with a strong interest in politics are far more likely to regard their surrounding social world as being about politics compared to their less interested counterparts.

On the consequences of citizens’ differing conceptions of politics - are citizens’ conceptions of politics related to their political participation? The simple answer to this question is “yes.” Citizens who embrace a broad conception of politics are more likely to be involved in political activities.

This comprehensive account of citizens’ conceptions of politics indicates that the conception of politics is a political orientation that deserves more attention in research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2024. p. 84
Series
Örebro Studies in Political Science, ISSN 1650-1632 ; 47
Keywords
Conceptions of politics, political participation, SES, Psychological engagement, democracy, equal participation
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-113204 (URN)9789175295565 (ISBN)
Public defence
2024-06-05, Örebro universitet, Forumhuset, Hörsal F, Fakultetsgatan 1, Örebro, 13:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-04-17 Created: 2024-04-17 Last updated: 2024-05-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Görtz, CarlZorell, Carolin V.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Görtz, CarlZorell, Carolin V.
By organisation
School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences
In the same journal
Acta Politica
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 234 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf