To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Automatic and effortful control of interference in working memory can be distinguished by unique behavioral and functional brain representations
Aging Research Center (ARC), Karolinska Institute and Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden; Umeå Center of Functional Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Aging Research Center (ARC), Karolinska Institute and Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden. (Center for Life-span Developmental Research (LEADER))ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9143-3730
2022 (English)In: NeuroImage, ISSN 1053-8119, E-ISSN 1095-9572, Vol. 253, article id 119098Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Goal-irrelevant information in working memory (WM) may enter the focus of attention (FOA) during a task and cause proactive interference (PI). In the current study we used fMRI to test several hypotheses concerning the boundary conditions of PI in WM using a modified verbal 2-back task. Temporal distance between item and lure presentation was manipulated to evaluate potential differences among hypothesized states of FOA, short-term memory and long-term memory. PI was present for the most proximal 3-back lures but dissipated with lure distance along with increased activation in brain regions critical for memory recollection, such as right prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and hippocampus. Reduced PI and less IFG activation were also observed after repeated item presentation, supporting the notion that a rehearsed encoding of item-context information reduces the need for interference control. Moreover, a trial-by-trial approach revealed activity in ACC, insula, IFG, and parietal cortex with increasing lure trial interference regardless of distance. The current results are first evidence for an observable transition of cognitive control, to include MTL regions involved in recalling task-relevant information from outside the FOA when resolving PI in WM.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 253, article id 119098
Keywords [en]
Proactive interference, fMRI, interference control, n-back, working memory
National Category
Neurosciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-98159DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119098ISI: 000789873100010PubMedID: 35301129Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85126884972OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-98159DiVA, id: diva2:1645905
Available from: 2022-03-21 Created: 2022-03-21 Last updated: 2022-05-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Persson, Jonas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Persson, Jonas
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work
In the same journal
NeuroImage
Neurosciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 35 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf