To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cochlear implant in Cogan syndrome
Audiology Department, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Audiology Department, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Audiology Department, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Audiology Department, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: Acta Oto-Laryngologica, ISSN 0001-6489, E-ISSN 1651-2251, Vol. 131, no 5, p. 494-497Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Conclusions: Despite the need for special fitting strategies, improvements in speech discrimination tests support the use of cochlear implantation (CI) for patients with Cogan syndrome. Adequate preimplant counselling is mandatory, to prevent high expectations and to stress the necessity for bilateral implantation.

Objective: In 60% of patients with Cogan syndrome, CI remains the only treatment option. Literature data agree that once the electrode array is properly inserted, functional outcomes are very good. Nevertheless, results may deteriorate due to progressive cochlear ossification. A few studies have documented the outcomes of CI in these patients, but none have reported the long-term results.

Methods: This was a retrospective study describing the outcomes of 3 implanted patients with Cogan syndrome – among 300 adult patients who received a cochlear implant, 3 had become deaf due to Cogan syndrome.

Results: In one patient the cochlear ossification advanced and the speech perception abilities worsened from the highest category to identification of words in closed set. The second patient complained of an abrupt reduction of loudness at 18 months post-implant, which required an increased electrical stimulation. The third patient reached the identification category probably due to auditory dyssynchrony, as an atypical consequence of the syndrome.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2011. Vol. 131, no 5, p. 494-497
Keywords [en]
Deafness, Cochlear obliteration, Cochlear ossification
National Category
Otorhinolaryngology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-98204DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2010.535214ISI: 000289562600006PubMedID: 21171833Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-79954520360OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-98204DiVA, id: diva2:1646094
Available from: 2022-03-21 Created: 2022-03-21 Last updated: 2022-03-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Castiglione, Alessandro

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Castiglione, Alessandro
In the same journal
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Otorhinolaryngology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 96 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf