To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of gastrointestinal side effects from different doses of azithromycin for the treatment of gonorrhoea
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Institute for Global Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1710-2081
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, ISSN 0305-7453, E-ISSN 1460-2091, Vol. 77, no 7, p. 2011-2016Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: Azithromycin is commonly used to treat Neisseria gonorrhoeae. We compared its gastrointestinal side effects using 1 g single, 2 g single or 2 g split (i.e. 1 g plus 1 g 6-12 h later) dosing, representing our clinic's changing guidelines over the study period.

METHODS: We recruited consecutive sexual health clinic patients who received azithromycin (and 500 mg ceftriaxone) for uncomplicated gonorrhoea. Each patient received a text message 48 h after their attendance to complete a questionnaire.

RESULTS: Patients received 1 g single (n = 271), 2 g single (218) or 2 g split (105) doses. Vomiting was less common for 1 g versus 2 g single dose [1.1% versus 3.7%; risk difference (RD): -2.6%; 95% CI: -0.2 to -5.4] and 2 g split versus 2 g single dose (0.9% versus 3.7%; RD: -2.8%; 95% CI: -0.3 to -5.8). Nausea was less common for 1 g versus 2 g single dose (13.7% versus 43.1%; RD: -29.5%; 95% CI: -21.7 to -37.2) and 2 g split versus 2 g single dose (16.4% versus 43.1%; RD: -26.8; 95% CI: -17.2 to -36.3). Diarrhoea was less common for 1 g versus 2 g single dose (25.5% versus 50.9%; RD: -25.5%; 95% CI: -17.0 to -33.9) and 2 g split versus 2 g single dose (30.9% versus 50.9%; RD: -20.0; 95% CI: -9.1 to -30.9). Almost all were willing to retake the same dosing for gonorrhoea in the future: 97% for 1 g single; 94% for 2 g single; and 97% for 2 g split dose.

CONCLUSIONS: Azithromycin 2 g split dose for gonorrhoea resulted in significantly less vomiting, nausea and diarrhoea than a 2 g single dose.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2022. Vol. 77, no 7, p. 2011-2016
National Category
Infectious Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-98557DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac118ISI: 000786045000001PubMedID: 35411400Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85133214010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-98557DiVA, id: diva2:1651701
Note

Funding agency:

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia GNT1193955 GNT1172873 GNT1172900 GNT1136117

Available from: 2022-04-13 Created: 2022-04-13 Last updated: 2022-08-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Unemo, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Unemo, Magnus
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Infectious Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 9 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf