To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Effectiveness and Tolerability of a Very Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Compared to Low and High-Volume Polyethylene Glycol-Solutions in the Real-Life Setting
Department of Gastroenterology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Gastroenterology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0942-0816
Department of Medicine, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Department of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Diagnostics, ISSN 2075-4418, Vol. 12, no 5, article id 1155Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Adequate bowel cleansing is essential for high-quality colonoscopy. Recently, a new very low-volume 1 litre (1L) polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus ascorbate solution (ASC) has been introduced. Our aims were to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of this product compared to low-volume 2L PEG-ASC and high-volume 4L PEG solutions, in a real-life setting. In six endoscopy units in Sweden, outpatients undergoing colonoscopy were either prescribed solutions according to local routines, or the very low-volume solution in split dose regimen. Bowel cleansing effectiveness and patient experience was assessed using the Boston Bowel preparation scale (BBPS) and a patient questionnaire. A total of 1098 patients (mean age 58 years, 52% women) were included. All subsegment and the total BBPS scores were significantly greater for 1L PEG-ASC in comparison to other solutions (p < 0.05 for 1L PEG-ASC and 4L PEG for transverse and left colon, otherwise p < 0.001). Nausea was more frequent with 1L PEG-ASC compared to 2L PEG-ASC (p < 0.001) and vomiting were more often reported compared to both other solutions (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 for 2L PEG-ASC and 4L PEG, respectively). Smell, taste, and total experience was better for 1L PEG-ASC compared to 4L PEG (p < 0.001), and similar compared to the 2L PEG-ASC. In conclusion, 1L PEG-ASC leads to better bowel cleansing compared to 2L PEG-ASC or 4L PEG products, with similar or greater patient satisfaction.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI , 2022. Vol. 12, no 5, article id 1155
Keywords [en]
bowel preparation, colonoscopy, polyethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate, effectiveness, tolerability
National Category
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-99443DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051155ISI: 000801916300001PubMedID: 35626310Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85130185189OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-99443DiVA, id: diva2:1667521
Available from: 2022-06-10 Created: 2022-06-10 Last updated: 2022-06-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Nyhlin, Nils

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nyhlin, NilsToth, Ervin
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Diagnostics
Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 99 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf