To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Adaptive Hearing Aid Benefit in Children With Mild/Moderate Hearing Loss: A Registered, Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial
Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati Ohio, USA; Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati Ohio, USA.
Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati Ohio, USA; Department of Research and Development, Gateway Biotechnology Inc., Rootstown Ohio, USA.
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. Department of Neuroscience, Unit for SLP, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3535-8489
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Ear and Hearing, ISSN 0196-0202, E-ISSN 1538-4667, Vol. 43, no 5, p. 1402-1415Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: We completed a registered double-blind randomized control trial to compare acclimatization to two hearing aid fitting algorithms by experienced pediatric hearing aid users with mild to moderate hearing loss. We hypothesized that extended use (up to 13 months) of an adaptive algorithm with integrated directionality and noise reduction, OpenSound Navigator (OSN), would result in improved performance on auditory, cognitive, academic, and caregiver- or self-report measures compared with a control, omnidirectional algorithm (OMNI).

DESIGN: Forty children aged 6 to 13 years with mild to moderate/severe symmetric sensorineural hearing loss completed this study. They were all experienced hearing aid users and were recruited through the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Division of Audiology. The children were divided into 20 pairs based on similarity of age (within 1 year) and hearing loss (level and configuration). Individuals from each pair were randomly assigned to either an OSN (experimental) or OMNI (control) fitting algorithm group. Each child completed an audiology evaluation, hearing aid fitting using physically identical Oticon OPN hearing aids, follow-up audiological appointment, and 2 research visits up to 13 months apart. Research visit outcome measures covered speech perception (in quiet and in noise), novel grammar and word learning, cognition, academic ability, and caregiver report of listening behaviors. Analysis of outcome differences between visits, groups, ages, conditions and their interactions used linear mixed models. Between 22 and 39 children provided useable data for each task.

RESULTS: Children using the experimental (OSN) algorithm did not show any significant performance differences on the outcome measures compared with those using the control (OMNI) algorithm. Overall performance of all children in the study increased across the duration of the trial on word repetition in noise, sentence repetition in quiet, and caregivers' assessment of hearing ability. There was a significant negative relationship between age at first hearing aid use, final Reading and Mathematical ability, and caregiver rated speech hearing. A significant positive relationship was found between daily hearing aid use and study-long change in performance on the Flanker test of inhibitory control and attention. Logged daily use of hearing aids related to caregiver rated spatial hearing. All results controlled for age at testing/evaluation and false discovery rate.

CONCLUSIONS: Use of the experimental (OSN) algorithm neither enhanced nor reduced performance on auditory, cognitive, academic or caregiver report measures compared with the control (OMNI) algorithm. However, prolonged hearing aid use led to benefits in hearing, academic skills, attention, and caregiver evaluation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2022. Vol. 43, no 5, p. 1402-1415
Keywords [en]
Acclimatization, Clinical trial, Hearing aids, Mild to moderate hearing loss, Pediatric
National Category
Otorhinolaryngology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-101046DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001230ISI: 000843475700003PubMedID: 35758427Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85137124156OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-101046DiVA, id: diva2:1692172
Note

Funding agencies:

Oticon Foundation 17-2441

Oticon

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)

 

Available from: 2022-09-01 Created: 2022-09-01 Last updated: 2022-11-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Nakeva von Mentzer, Cecilia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nakeva von Mentzer, Cecilia
By organisation
School of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Ear and Hearing
Otorhinolaryngology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 93 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf