To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Predictors of treatment failure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: Up to 14 years of recorded follow-up
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; School of Community/Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA; Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics-Gynecology Division, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics-Gynecology Division, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics-Gynecology Division, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine-Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Oncology Letters, ISSN 1792-1074, E-ISSN 1792-1082, Vol. 24, no 4, article id 357Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The incidence of adenocarcinoma-in-situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix is rising, with invasive adenocarcinoma becoming increasingly common relative to squamous cell carcinoma. The present study reviewed a cohort of 84 patients first-time treated by conization for histologically-confirmed AIS from January 2001 to January 2017, to identify risk factors associated with recurrent/persistent AIS as well as progression to invasive cervical cancer. Nearly 80% of the patients were age 40 or younger at conization. Endocervical and ectocervical margins were deemed clear in 42 of the patients. All but two patients had ≥1 follow-up, with post-conization high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) results documented in 52 patients. Altogether, 12 histopathologically-confirmed recurrences (14.3%) were detected; two of these patients had microinvasive or invasive carcinoma. In three other patients cytology showed AIS, but without recorded histopathology. Eight patients underwent hysterectomy for incomplete resection very soon after primary conization; they were not included in bivariate or multivariate analyses. Having ≥1 post-follow-up positive HPV finding yielded the highest sensitivity for histologically-confirmed recurrence: 87.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.4-99.7]. Current or historical smoking status provided highest specificity: 94.4 (95% CI 72.7-99.9) and overall accuracy: 88.0 (95% CI 68.8-97.5) for histologically-confirmed recurrence. With multiple logistic regression (MLR), adjusting for age at conization and abnormal follow-up cytology, positive HPV18 was the strongest predictor of histologically-confirmed recurrence (P<0.005). Having ≥2 positive HPV results also predicted recurrence (P<0.02). Any unclear margin yielded an odds ratio 7.21 (95% CI 1.34-38.7) for histologically-confirmed recurrence adjusting for age, but became non-significant when including abnormal cytology in the MLR model. The strong predictive value of HPV, particularly HPV18 and persistent HPV positivity vis-à-vis detected recurrence indicated that regular HPV testing for patients treated for AIS is imperative. In conclusion, furthering a participatory approach, including attention to smoking with encouragement to attend needed long-term follow-up, can better protect these patients at high risk for cervical cancer.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Spandidos Publications , 2022. Vol. 24, no 4, article id 357
Keywords [en]
Adenocarcinoma-in-situ, margin status, papillomavirus infection, treatment failure
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-101539DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13477ISI: 000861095000001PubMedID: 36168314Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85138642321OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-101539DiVA, id: diva2:1699803
Available from: 2022-09-29 Created: 2022-09-29 Last updated: 2023-07-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Mints, Miriam

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mints, Miriam
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Oncology Letters
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 149 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf