To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intersectional perspectives on the employment rate in Supported Employment for people with psychiatric, neuropsychiatric, or intellectual disabilities: A scoping review
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3793-1031
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden .ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4578-0501
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; Audiological Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden .ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2298-6806
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; Audiological Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; Centre for the Study of Professions, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway .ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3023-3422
2023 (English)In: Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation, ISSN 1051-9815, E-ISSN 1875-9270, Vol. 74, no 2, p. 435-454Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Supported Employment (SE) has shown better results in the employment rate for persons with disabilities than other methods within vocational rehabilitation, but how SE affects the employment rate for subgroups in the interventions needs further attention.

OBJECTIVE: To examine previous research regarding the influence of intersecting statuses on the employment rate in SE for people with psychiatric, neuropsychiatric, or intellectual disabilities according to type of diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, age, level of education and previous work history.

METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in nine databases including peer-reviewed articles from 2000 to April 2021. Articles presenting the employment rate in SE interventions according to the intersecting statuses listed in the objective were included.

RESULTS: The searches identified 3777 unique records, of which 53 articles were included in data extraction. In most of the included articles, intersecting statuses did not affect the employment rate for people in the SE interventions with psychiatric disabilities. Few studies have examined neuropsychiatric and intellectual disabilities. A majority of the studies subjected to full-text analysis were excluded due to a lack of reporting of the effects of intersecting statuses on the employment rate. The studies that reported on the effects of intersecting statuses on the employment rate often had small samples and lacked statistical power.

CONCLUSIONS: Intersecting statuses do not appear to affect the employment rate for people receiving SE interventions, but systematic reviews with pooled samples need to be undertaken because of the low reporting rate and underpowered sample sizes in existing studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOS Press, 2023. Vol. 74, no 2, p. 435-454
Keywords [en]
Supported”, disabilities, intersectionality, “Employment, “mental disorders”, “vocational rehabilitation”
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Research subject
Social Work; Disability research
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-101908DOI: 10.3233/WOR-211155ISI: 000939517200008PubMedID: 36278382Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85148965463OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-101908DiVA, id: diva2:1706031
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, STYB-2019/0005Available from: 2022-10-25 Created: 2022-10-25 Last updated: 2024-08-16Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. A gender perspective on Supported Employment: Does gender influence access, process, and employment outcomes?
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A gender perspective on Supported Employment: Does gender influence access, process, and employment outcomes?
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Several systematic reviews have found the vocational rehabilitation (VR) intervention of Supported Employment (SE) to be more efficient for persons with disabilities to obtain employment than other interventions within VR. Nevertheless, there is a lack of research on how the intervention works for men and women.

Aim: To explore the influence of gender on access, processes, and employment outcomes in VR, designed according to the SE method, for men and women with psychiatric, neuropsychiatric, or intellectual disabilities.

Methods: Study I was a scoping review to examine what has been reported regarding the influence of different intersecting statuses on the employment rate after participating in an SE intervention. Study II was a focus group study with employment specialists exploring their social representations of gender in relation to disability, VR, and working life .Study III was a qualitative interview study exploring participants’ experiences of SE interventions. Study IV was a mixed method multiple case study using qualitative comparative analysis to explore enabling and barrier conditions in SE interventions.

Results: In the triangulation of the four studies, two superordinate themes evolved. In the material, gendered paths through the welfare system resulted in women having less access to SE interventions, and when participating in an SE intervention, women with disabilities with high responsibilities for home and family struggled to find enough resources to focus on vocational rehabilitation.

Conclusion: For SE to become more equal and better suited for all persons with disabilities interested in employment, regardless of gender, the accessibility to SE and the SE method needs to be developed to better suit the diversified needs of SE participants.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2024. p. 120
Series
Studies in disability research, ISSN 2004-4887 ; 116
Keywords
Disability, Gender, Supported Employment, Vocational Rehabilitation, Sweden
National Category
Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-113343 (URN)9789175295633 (ISBN)9789175295640 (ISBN)
Public defence
2024-09-06, Örebro universitet, Forumhuset, Hörsal F, Fakultetsgatan 1, Örebro, 09:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-04-25 Created: 2024-04-25 Last updated: 2024-08-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Witte, IngridStrandberg, ThomasGranberg, SarahGustafsson, Johanna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Witte, IngridStrandberg, ThomasGranberg, SarahGustafsson, Johanna
By organisation
School of Health SciencesSchool of Law, Psychology and Social Work
In the same journal
Work: A journal of Prevention, Assessment and rehabilitation
Occupational Health and Environmental HealthSocial Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 342 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf