To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Swedish translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool for use in the operating room
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. Nursing Science Unit, Swedish Centre for Skin and Wound Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7862-3652
Skin Integrity Research Group (SKINT), University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Belgium.
Örebro University, School of Health Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. University Health Care Research Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0435-8424
Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden; Faculty of Health, Welfare and Organisation, Östfold University College, Fredrikstad, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: International Wound Journal, ISSN 1742-4801, E-ISSN 1742-481X, Vol. 20, no 5, p. 1534-1543Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the Swedish operating room version of PUKAT 2.0. In total, 284 Swedish operating room nurses completed the survey of whom 50 completed the retest. The item difficulty P-value of 14 items ranged between 0.38 and 0.96 (median 0.65). Three items were found to be too easy (0.90-0.96). The D-value of 14 items ranged between 0.00 and 0.42 (median 0.46). Three items had a D-value lower than 0.20 (0.11-0.16) and eight items scored higher than 0.40 (0.45-0.61). The quality of the response alternatives (a-value) ranged between 0.00 and 0.42. This showed that nurses with a master's degree had a higher knowledge than nurses with a professional degree (respectively 9.4/14 versus 8.6/14; t = -2.4, df = 199, P = 0.02). The ICC was 0.65 (95% CI 0.45-0.78). The ICCs for the domains varied from 0.12 (95% CI = -0.16-0.39) to 0.59 (95% CI = 0.38-0.75). Results indicated that 11 of the original items contributed to the overall validity. However, the low participation in the test-retest made the reliability of the instrument low. An extended evaluation with a larger sample should be considered in order to confirm aspects of the psychometric properties of this instrument.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2023. Vol. 20, no 5, p. 1534-1543
Keywords [en]
PUKAT2.0, knowledge, operating room nurse, pressure ulcer, psychometric evaluation
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-102168DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14008ISI: 000877217900001PubMedID: 36318882Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85141364082OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-102168DiVA, id: diva2:1710187
Available from: 2022-11-11 Created: 2022-11-11 Last updated: 2024-03-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Falk-Brynhildsen, KarinWistrand, CamillaGifford, MervynBeeckman, Dimitri

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falk-Brynhildsen, KarinWistrand, CamillaGifford, MervynBeeckman, Dimitri
By organisation
School of Health SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
International Wound Journal
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 53 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf