To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Common bile duct stones management: A network meta-analysis
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7097-487X
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1918-9443
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3583-3443
Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, Unidad de Cirugía de Urgencias y Trauma, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla Andalucia, Spain.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, ISSN 2163-0755, E-ISSN 2163-0763, Vol. 93, no 5, p. E155-E165Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Timely management is critical for treating symptomatic common bile duct (CBD) stones; however, a single optimal management strategy has yet to be defined in the acute care setting. Consequently, this systematic review and network meta-analysis, comparing one-stage (CBD exploration or intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP] with simultaneous cholecystectomy) and two-stage (precholecystectomy or postcholecystectomy ERCP) procedures, was undertaken with the main outcomes of interest being postprocedural complications and hospital length of stay (LOS).

METHODS: PubMed, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were methodically queried for articles from 2010 to 2021. The search terms were a combination of medical subject headings terms and the subsequent terms: gallstone; common bile duct (stone); choledocholithiasis; cholecystitis; endoscopic retrograde cholangiography/ERCP; common bile duct exploration; intraoperative, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography: stone extraction; and one-stage and two-stage procedure. Studies that compared two procedures or more were included, whereas studies not recording complications (bile leak, hemorrhage, pancreatitis, perforation, intra-abdominal infections, and other infections) or LOS were excluded. A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the four different approaches for managing CBD stones.

RESULTS: A total of 16 studies (8,644 participants) addressing the LOS and 41 studies (19,756 participants) addressing postprocedural complications were included in the analysis. The one-stage approaches were associated with a decrease in LOS compared with the two-stage approaches. Common bile duct exploration demonstrated a lower overall risk of complications compared with preoperative ERCP, but there were no differences in the overall risk orcomplications in the remaining comparisons. However, differences in specific postprocedural complications were detected between the four different approaches managing CBD stones.

CONCLUSION: This network meta-analysis suggests that both laparoscopic CBD exploration and intraoperative ERCP have equally good outcomes and provide a preferable single-anesthesia patient pathway with a shorter overall length of hospital stay compared with the two-stage approaches.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2022. Vol. 93, no 5, p. E155-E165
Keywords [en]
Common bile duct stone, choledocholithiasis, ERCP, common bile duct exploration, one- and two-stage procedure
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-102209DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003755ISI: 000874697100001PubMedID: 35939370Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85140655904OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-102209DiVA, id: diva2:1710800
Available from: 2022-11-14 Created: 2022-11-14 Last updated: 2024-03-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Mohseni, ShahinBass, Gary AlanForssten, Maximilian PeterCao, Yang

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mohseni, ShahinBass, Gary AlanForssten, Maximilian PeterCao, Yang
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 44 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf