Diabetes-related symptoms, acute complications and management of diabetes mellitus of patients who are receiving palliative care: a protocol for a systematic reviewShow others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 9, no 6, article id e028604
Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Introduction: Worldwide, an estimated 40 million people are in need of palliative care each year, but only 14% receive it. The incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients receiving palliative care is higher than in the general population. This association is intended to grow as a result of the rising burden of DM worldwide, ageing populations and the improved overall survival time of several diseases over the last few decades. Recommendations for DM management in the context of palliative care are mainly based on expert opinion as there is a lack of suitable evidence base and randomised clinical trials in palliative care are scarce. The aim of our systematic review is to identify the best DM management practices in order to reduce important DM-related symptoms and acute complications in patients receiving palliative care.
Methods and analysis: The authors will study the DM treatment and management literature, surveying the different approaches employed to treat adult palliative patients. Core health bibliographic databases will be searched from January 1990 to May 2019. Data sources will include Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and grey literature. Details regarding diet, oral and injectable glucose-lowering medicines, insulin regimens and blood glucose monitoring strategies will he evaluated. We defined the primary outcomes to compare between DM management approaches as the presence of symptoms (polyuria, polydipsia and polyphagia) and acute complications of DM (hypoglycaemia, hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar state and diabetic ketoacidosis), and secondary outcomes as hospital admissions and deaths due to DM-related complications, health-related quality of life and glycaemic control.
Ethics and dissemination: The systematic review methodology does not require ethics approval due to the nature of the study design. The results of the systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will he publicly available.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018115772.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2019. Vol. 9, no 6, article id e028604
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-105493DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028604ISI: 000562117100180PubMedID: 31203247Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85067416496OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-105493DiVA, id: diva2:1750467
2023-04-132023-04-132023-08-28Bibliographically approved