Environmental assessment of cytotoxic drugs in healthcare settings: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysisShow others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Systematic Reviews, E-ISSN 2046-4053, Vol. 9, no 1, article id 242Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: Occupational exposure to cytotoxic drugs is associated with various unfavorable health outcomes. This protocol reports a methodology for a systematic review and meta-analysis that aims to systematically review the published literature and quantify the level of environmental contamination of healthcare settings with cytotoxic drugs.
Methods: This protocol is developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol-2015 (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and EMBASE) will be searched with no restrictions on publication period. Eligible studies will be identified and data will be extracted using a predefined data extraction form by at least two independent reviewers following best practice. Eligible studies should report calculated or calculable estimates on the proportion of positive samples tested for cytotoxic drugs and/or estimates on the concentration of the cytotoxic drug(s) in the tested samples. Risk of bias (RoB) will be assessed by using the RoB in Studies estimating Prevalence of Exposure to Occupational risk factors (RoB-SPEO) tool, which developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Labour Organization (ILO) for environmental and occupational health systematic reviews. The random-effects model will be used to perform meta-analyses.
Discussion: Occupational exposure to cytotoxic drugs is associated with short- and long-term adverse health outcomes. Following this protocol, the review to be carried out will be the first to fill an evidence gap on the environmental contamination of healthcare settings with cytotoxic drugs. The findings of this review will help in the understanding of the risk of occupational exposure of healthcare workers to cytotoxic drugs and facilitate the identification of priority areas for specific interventions.
Ethics and dissemination: The systematic review methodology does not require ethics approval due to the nature of the study design. The results of the systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be publicly available.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, dated July 14, 2020
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2020. Vol. 9, no 1, article id 242
Keywords [en]
Cytotoxic drugs, Environmental assessment, Systematic review, Meta-analysis
National Category
General Practice
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-105488DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01494-4ISI: 000585116000001PubMedID: 33076972Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85092912555OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-105488DiVA, id: diva2:1750558
2023-04-132023-04-132023-04-25Bibliographically approved