To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Finding the optimal candidate for shock wave lithotripsy: external validation and comparison of five prediction models
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Radiology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8949-119X
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Urology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0162-5881
Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Infection Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Urology Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Urolithiasis, ISSN 2194-7228, Vol. 51, no 1, article id 66Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We aimed to externally validate five previously published predictive models (Ng score, Triple D score, S3HoCKwave score, Kim nomogram, Niwa nomogram) for shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) single-session outcomes in patients with a solitary stone in the upper ureter. The validation cohort included patients treated with SWL from September 2011 to December 2019 at our institution. Patient-related variables were retrospectively collected from the hospital records. Stone-related data including all measurements were retrieved from computed tomography prior to SWL. We estimated discrimination using area under the curve (AUC), calibration, and clinical net benefit based on decision curve analysis (DCA). A total of 384 patients with proximal ureter stones treated with SWL were included in the analysis. Median age was 55.5 years, and 282 (73%) of the sample were men. Median stone length was 8.0 mm. All models significantly predicted the SWL outcomes after one session. S3HoCKwave score, Niwa, and Kim nomograms had the highest accuracy in predicting outcomes, with AUC 0.716, 0.714 and 0.701, respectively. These three models outperformed both the Ng (AUC: 0.670) and Triple D (AUC: 0.667) scoring systems, approaching statistical significance (P = 0.05). Of all the models, the Niwa nomogram showed the strongest calibration and highest net benefit in DCA. To conclude, the models showed small differences in predictive power. The Niwa nomogram, however, demonstrated acceptable discrimination, the most accurate calibration, and the highest net benefit whilst having relatively simple design. Therefore, it could be useful for counselling patients with a solitary stone in the upper ureter.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2023. Vol. 51, no 1, article id 66
Keywords [en]
Nomograms, Outcomes, Shock wave lithotripsy, Ureteral stones, Validation
National Category
Urology and Nephrology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-105452DOI: 10.1007/s00240-023-01444-4ISI: 000964219300001PubMedID: 37027057Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85152171202OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-105452DiVA, id: diva2:1750913
Funder
Örebro University
Note

Funding agency:

Örebro County Council OLL-935231 OLL-979997

Available from: 2023-04-14 Created: 2023-04-14 Last updated: 2024-01-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Popiolek, MarcinJendeberg, JohanSundqvist, PernillaLidén, Mats

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Popiolek, MarcinJendeberg, JohanSundqvist, PernillaLidén, Mats
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
Urology and Nephrology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 27 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf