To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of and Attitudes towards a Standardized Content Description of Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Programs for Patients with Chronic Pain-A Qualitative Study
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, SE-791 88 Falun, Sweden.
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Behavioural, Social and Legal Sciences. (The Center for Health and Medical Psychology)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9429-9012
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, ISSN 1661-7827, E-ISSN 1660-4601, Vol. 20, no 9, article id 5661Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation (IPR) is a recommended treatment for people with chronic pain. An inadequate description of the content of IPR programs makes it difficult to draw conclusions regarding their effects. The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions and attitudes of healthcare professionals toward a content description of IPR programs for patients with chronic pain. Individual interviews with healthcare professionals (n = 11) working in IPR teams in Sweden were conducted between February and May 2019. Analysis of the interviews resulted in a theme: interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation is a complex intervention, with three categories: limitations in the description of IPR programs; lack of knowledge about IPR and chronic pain; and facilitating and hindering factors for using the content description of IPR programs. Conclusion: Healthcare professionals perceived that IPR programs could be described through a general content description. A general content description could enhance the quality of IPR programs through a better understanding of their content and a comparison of different IPR programs. Healthcare professionals also expressed the importance of a content description being a guide rather than a steering document.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Journal Issues Limited , 2023. Vol. 20, no 9, article id 5661
Keywords [en]
TIDieR checklist, complex interventions, content description, healthcare professionals, individual interviews, interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-105954DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20095661PubMedID: 37174179Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85159055565OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-105954DiVA, id: diva2:1756781
Available from: 2023-05-15 Created: 2023-05-15 Last updated: 2023-12-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Boersma, Katja

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Boersma, Katja
By organisation
School of Behavioural, Social and Legal Sciences
In the same journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf