To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Diagnostic spirometry in COPD is increasing, a comparison of two Swedish cohorts
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences.
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Centre for Clinical Research and Education, Region Värmland, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4241-7851
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, E-ISSN 2055-1010, Vol. 33, no 1, article id 23Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Spirometry should be used to confirm a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This test is not always performed, leading to possible misdiagnosis. We investigated whether the proportion of patients with diagnostic spirometry has increased over time as well as factors associated with omitted or incorrectly interpreted spirometry. Data from medical reviews and a questionnaire from primary and secondary care patients with a doctors' diagnosis of COPD between 2004 and 2010 were collected. Data were compared with a COPD cohort diagnosed between 2000 and 2003. Among 703 patients with a first diagnosis of COPD between 2004 and 2010, 88% had a diagnostic spirometry, compared with 59% (p < 0.001) in the previous cohort. Factors associated with not having diagnostic spirometry were current smoking (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.36-3.60), low educational level (OR 1.81; 1.09-3.02) and management in primary care (OR 2.28; 1.02-5.14). The correct interpretation of spirometry results increased (75% vs 82%; p = 0.010). Among patients with a repeated spirometry, 94% had a persistent FEV1/FVC or FEV1/VC ratio <0.70.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nature Publishing Group, 2023. Vol. 33, no 1, article id 23
National Category
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-106171DOI: 10.1038/s41533-023-00345-8ISI: 000999605900001PubMedID: 37264017Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85160925109OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-106171DiVA, id: diva2:1762164
Funder
Bror Hjerpstedts stiftelse
Note

Funding agency:

Uppsala County Association Against Heart and Lung Diseases

Available from: 2023-06-02 Created: 2023-06-02 Last updated: 2024-01-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Athlin, ÅsaHasselgren, MikaelMontgomery, ScottGiezeman, MaaikeSundh, Josefin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Athlin, ÅsaHasselgren, MikaelMontgomery, ScottGiezeman, MaaikeSundh, Josefin
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 136 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf