When should targeted therapies be used in the treatment of lupus nephritis: Early in the disease course or in refractory patients?
2024 (English) In: Autoimmunity Reviews, ISSN 1568-9972, E-ISSN 1873-0183, Vol. 23, no 1, article id 103418Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Although the prognosis of lupus nephritis (LN) has improved over the last few decades, 5-20% of patients still progress to kidney failure. Hence, there is an unmet need to improve the management of LN. Two novel drugs, belimumab and voclosporin, have been recently approved for LN and obinutuzumab is in the late stage of development. In randomised controlled trials (RCTs), all these drugs, added to the standard-of-care, were more effective than standard-of-care alone in achieving renal response. Now the question is: should these new drugs be used early in the disease course or just in refractory patients? The main reasons supporting the early use are based on the RCTs that demonstrated benefits when combinatory regimen was initiated early in incident and relapsing patients leading to a higher proportion of patients to achieve renal response, hence reducing nephron loss and the risk of kidney failure. The main reasons supporting the use of the combinatory regimens primarily in relapsing/refractory patients acknowledge that many patients responded well even without add-on medications, allowing a more economic use of innovative and costly drugs. However, good predictors of renal response to standard-of-care are lacking and, thus, the decision of adding new treatments early or just in refractory or relapsing patients has to consider drug access, risks of over or undertreatment, and preservation of kidney function in high-risk individuals.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 23, no 1, article id 103418
Keywords [en]
Biological drugs, Combination therapy, management, Lupus nephritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-107856 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103418 ISI: 001223174800001 PubMedID: 37625673 Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85171436754 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-107856 DiVA, id: diva2:1791902
Funder Swedish Rheumatism Association, R-969696 King Gustaf V Jubilee Fund, FAI-2020-0741 Swedish Society of Medicine, SLS-974449 Nyckelfonden, OLL-974804 Region Stockholm, FoUI-955483 Karolinska Institute
Note IP is supported by grants from the Swedish Rheumatism Association(R-969696), King Gustaf V's 80-year Foundation (FAI-2020-0741), Swedish Society of Medicine (SLS-974449), Nyckelfonden (OLL-974804), Professor Nanna Svartz Foundation (2021-00436), Ulla and Roland Gustafsson Foundation (2021-26), Region Stockholm (FoUI-955483), and Karolinska Institutet. IP has received research funding and/or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia, Elli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Otsuka, and Roche. HJA received payments from GSK, Astra-Zeneca, and Novartis.
2023-08-282023-08-282025-02-18 Bibliographically approved