To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
When should targeted therapies be used in the treatment of lupus nephritis: Early in the disease course or in refractory patients?
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Gastroenterology, Dermatology, and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4875-5395
Deparment of Medicine DIMED, Division of Rheumatology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Deparment of Medicine DIMED, Division of Rheumatology, University of Padua, Padua.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine IV, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
2024 (English)In: Autoimmunity Reviews, ISSN 1568-9972, E-ISSN 1873-0183, Vol. 23, no 1, article id 103418Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Although the prognosis of lupus nephritis (LN) has improved over the last few decades, 5-20% of patients still progress to kidney failure. Hence, there is an unmet need to improve the management of LN. Two novel drugs, belimumab and voclosporin, have been recently approved for LN and obinutuzumab is in the late stage of development. In randomised controlled trials (RCTs), all these drugs, added to the standard-of-care, were more effective than standard-of-care alone in achieving renal response. Now the question is: should these new drugs be used early in the disease course or just in refractory patients? The main reasons supporting the early use are based on the RCTs that demonstrated benefits when combinatory regimen was initiated early in incident and relapsing patients leading to a higher proportion of patients to achieve renal response, hence reducing nephron loss and the risk of kidney failure. The main reasons supporting the use of the combinatory regimens primarily in relapsing/refractory patients acknowledge that many patients responded well even without add-on medications, allowing a more economic use of innovative and costly drugs. However, good predictors of renal response to standard-of-care are lacking and, thus, the decision of adding new treatments early or just in refractory or relapsing patients has to consider drug access, risks of over or undertreatment, and preservation of kidney function in high-risk individuals.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 23, no 1, article id 103418
Keywords [en]
Biological drugs, Combination therapy, management, Lupus nephritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-107856DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103418ISI: 001223174800001PubMedID: 37625673Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85171436754OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-107856DiVA, id: diva2:1791902
Funder
Swedish Rheumatism Association, R-969696King Gustaf V Jubilee Fund, FAI-2020-0741Swedish Society of Medicine, SLS-974449Nyckelfonden, OLL-974804Region Stockholm, FoUI-955483Karolinska Institute
Note

IP is supported by grants from the Swedish Rheumatism Association(R-969696), King Gustaf V's 80-year Foundation (FAI-2020-0741), Swedish Society of Medicine (SLS-974449), Nyckelfonden (OLL-974804), Professor Nanna Svartz Foundation (2021-00436), Ulla and Roland Gustafsson Foundation (2021-26), Region Stockholm (FoUI-955483), and Karolinska Institutet. IP has received research funding and/or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia, Elli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Otsuka, and Roche. HJA received payments from GSK, Astra-Zeneca, and Novartis.

Available from: 2023-08-28 Created: 2023-08-28 Last updated: 2025-02-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Parodis, Ioannis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Parodis, Ioannis
By organisation
School of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Autoimmunity Reviews
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 6 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf