To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Transparency and accountability influences of regulation on risk control: the case of a Swedish bank
Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7914-2084
Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7759-9582
2020 (English)In: Journal of Management and Governance, ISSN 1385-3457, E-ISSN 1572-963X, Vol. 25, no 2, p. 475-508Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This qualitative in-depth case study explores the influence of financial regulation on risk control within Banque de Montagne, a large listed bank in Sweden. Specifically, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of the European Banking Authority´s Guidelines on Internal Governance (GL 44), through Swedish Financial Regulation FFFS 2014:1, on the bank’s risk organization along the three lines of defense model of internal control. FFFS 2014:1 requires banks to reform risk control structures, processes, and roles through a mandated split between the operational risk and compliance functions of the internal risk organization. Through an analysis of 41 interviews, more than 2100 pages of internal and external documents, and over 200 hours of observations from 2015 to 2017, the research identifies the relevant changes to transparency and accountability mechanisms across the three lines of defense within the organization. The operationalization of these concepts through risk control mechanisms is an important consideration for both banks and regulators who rely on the three lines of defense model as an industry-wide adoption for effective risk control. The findings suggest that whilst intra- and inter-organizational accountability mechanisms have strengthened under the changed organizational structure through the implementation of FFFS 2014:1, challenges to effective transparency remain and may have ambiguous consequences for both organizational and regulatory aims.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2020. Vol. 25, no 2, p. 475-508
Keywords [en]
accountability, internal control, regulatory compliance, risk control, three lines of defense, transparency
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-109741DOI: 10.1007/s10997-020-09550-wISI: 000599040600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85097408833OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-109741DiVA, id: diva2:1812562
Funder
Uppsala UniversityAvailable from: 2023-11-16 Created: 2023-11-16 Last updated: 2023-11-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Kashyap, Shruti

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kashyap, ShrutiIveroth, Einar
In the same journal
Journal of Management and Governance
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 120 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf