To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What Do We Know About People's Politics? Testing a New Framework for Understanding Different Conceptions of Politics
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences. Department of Political Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3136-7898
2024 (English)In: Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, ISSN 0304-3754, E-ISSN 2163-3150, Vol. 49, no 1, p. 3-23Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study aims to increase the understanding of citizens' different conceptions of politics. This is done by constructing a framework based on Heywood's seminal works (2002; 2004) on three prominent understandings of politics. Guided by the framework and adopting a factor-analytic approach using the National SOM survey conducted in Sweden in autumn 2020 (N = 1845), I found two theoretically interesting dimensions: a 'macro-politics' dimension that covers content related to government and the welfare state and a 'micro-politics' dimension that concerns content associated with everyday life. The largest group of respondents consists of people whose conceptions of politics solely cover 'macro-politics' (76.4%). The second largest group are those who do not consider either of these two dimensions to be political (12.9%). The opposite view to this, which combines 'macro-politics' and 'micro-politics', is held by a slightly smaller group (9.4%). A minor group was also found, consisting of people whose conception of politics only covers 'micro-politics' (1.2%). We ran analyses based on previous important findings on people's conceptions of politics. Contrary to prevailing knowledge, the results show that left-leaners conceptualize (only) 'micro-politics' content as political more frequently than right-leaners, older people do not perceive more content as political than younger people (but view different content as political), and women, compared to men, identify more areas as political irrespective of content.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2024. Vol. 49, no 1, p. 3-23
Keywords [en]
conceptions of politics, political interest, democracy, SES, ideological disposition
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-109911DOI: 10.1177/03043754231211725ISI: 001100641500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85176327548OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-109911DiVA, id: diva2:1815515
Available from: 2023-11-29 Created: 2023-11-29 Last updated: 2024-05-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. What is Politics? Perspectives on the variations, origins, and consequences of citizens' conceptions of politics
Open this publication in new window or tab >>What is Politics? Perspectives on the variations, origins, and consequences of citizens' conceptions of politics
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

What is politics according to citizens? This thesis centers around that question and seeks to contribute to our understanding of citizens’ conceptions of politics. It discusses and investigates variations in, origins of, and consequences of con-ceptions of politics.

The theoretical perspectives direct interest to three levels of politics. The first concerns the political macro-level and political culture. The second takes an in-terest in the meso-level of politics and different subcultures. The third focuses on the micro-level, more specifically on individual citizens’ political participation.

Empirically, the thesis rests on three studies, based on two sets of survey data collected in Sweden and the U.S. The data sets from each country are fairly rep-resentative to the larger populations.

On citizens’ conceptions of politics - the disagreements found among scholars over the meaning of politics seem to be present among the public as well. There is no unified understanding of what politics is. The notions citizens have on the matter vary both in terms of breadth (how much of the social world they catego-rize as politics) and of content (the composition of phenomena they understand to be politics). In both countries examined in this thesis, some groups regardalmost nothing as political. At the same time, at the other end of the spectrum,there are groups whose conception of politics is so broad that it covers almost everything. Several other groups can also be discerned between these two ex-tremes.

On the origins of citizens’ differing conceptions of politics - several factorsseem to influence conceptions of politics, such as SES and demographic back-ground. Attitudinal orientations appear to have an impact as well. One factor, however, stands out: people’s interest in politics. People with a strong interest in politics are far more likely to regard their surrounding social world as being about politics compared to their less interested counterparts.

On the consequences of citizens’ differing conceptions of politics - are citizens’ conceptions of politics related to their political participation? The simple answer to this question is “yes.” Citizens who embrace a broad conception of politics are more likely to be involved in political activities.

This comprehensive account of citizens’ conceptions of politics indicates that the conception of politics is a political orientation that deserves more attention in research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro University, 2024. p. 84
Series
Örebro Studies in Political Science, ISSN 1650-1632 ; 47
Keywords
Conceptions of politics, political participation, SES, Psychological engagement, democracy, equal participation
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-113204 (URN)9789175295565 (ISBN)
Public defence
2024-06-05, Örebro universitet, Forumhuset, Hörsal F, Fakultetsgatan 1, Örebro, 13:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-04-17 Created: 2024-04-17 Last updated: 2025-05-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Görtz, Carl

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Görtz, Carl
By organisation
School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences
In the same journal
Alternatives: Global, Local, Political
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 132 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf