Novel Internet Support for Neck-Specific Rehabilitation Improves Work-Related Outcomes to the Same Extent as Extensive Visits to a Physiotherapy Clinic in Individuals with Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Prospective Randomised Study
2024 (English)In: Journal of occupational rehabilitation, ISSN 1053-0487, E-ISSN 1573-3688, Vol. 34, no 4, p. 873-883Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
PURPOSE: To address the current lack of information about work-related factors for individuals with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) we investigated the effectiveness of 3 months of neck-specific rehabilitation with internet support in combination with four physiotherapy visits (NSEIT) compared to the same exercises performed twice a week (24 times) at a physiotherapy clinic (NSE).
METHODS: This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial regarding secondary outcomes of work-related factors in 140 individuals with chronic moderate/severe WAD with 3- and 15-month follow-up.
RESULTS: There were no group differences between NSE and NSEIT in the Work Ability Scale or work subscales of the Neck Disability Index, Whiplash Disability Questionnaire or Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-work). Both groups improved in all work-related outcome measures, except for FABQ-work after the 3-month intervention and results were maintained at the 15-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite fewer physiotherapy visits for the NSEIT group, there were no group differences between NSEIT and NSE, with improvements in most work-related measures maintained at the 15-month follow-up. The results of the present study are promising for those with remaining work ability problems after a whiplash injury. Protocol registered before data collection started: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03022812.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2024. Vol. 34, no 4, p. 873-883
Keywords [en]
Exercise Therapy, Internet-Based Intervention, Spine, Whiplash Injuries, Work
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-112621DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10176-0ISI: 001190397800001PubMedID: 38526764Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85188546765OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-112621DiVA, id: diva2:1846942
Funder
Linköpings universitetSwedish Research CouncilVinnovaRegion ÖstergötlandRegion Sörmland
Note
Open access funding provided by Linköping University. Funding was received in competition and paid to the Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University or to the Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University. The authors acknowledge financial support from the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Innovation Agency, the Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden, and the county councils of Östergötland and Sörmland.
2024-03-262024-03-262025-02-11Bibliographically approved