To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Basicervical femoral neck fractures: an observational study derived from the Swedish Fracture Register
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention (Orthopaedics), Umeå University, Umeå.
Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention (Orthopaedics), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Research, Development, Education and Innovation, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Acta Orthopaedica, ISSN 1745-3674, E-ISSN 1745-3682, Vol. 95, p. 250-255Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Limited research has been conducted on basicervical femoral neck fractures (bFNFs). The importance of displacement in clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to characterize patient demographics, degree of displacement, treatment, treatment failures, and reoperations in a cohort of fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR). METHODS: 1,260 fractures in 1,185 individuals ≥ 60 years who had a bFNF registered in the SFR at 6 orthopedic departments from 2011 to 2020 were screened through radiographic review. The final sample included 291 patients with a confirmed bFNF. The medical records of these 291 patients were reviewed. We assessed baseline characteristics, initial fracture dislocation, treatment methods, tip-apex distance, failures, reoperations, and mortality.

RESULTS: The mean age was 82 years (range 60-101, 55% women). 98 (34%) were undisplaced and 193 (66%) displaced. All patients underwent operative treatment. In the undisplaced group 95 (97%) patients received internal fixation (IF) and 3 (3%) had primary hip arthroplasty. In the displaced group 149 (77%) received IF and 41 (21%) had primary hip arthroplasty. 33 (11%) suffered treatment failure. When treating an undisplaced bFNF with IF, only 3 (3%) experienced treatment failure, in contrast to the 24 (16%) failure rate for a displaced bFNF.

CONCLUSION: Undisplaced bFNFs have a low failure rate when treated with IF. For displaced bFNF treated with IF the failure rate is considerably higher. There is a need for further investigation of classification, treatment, and outcome of bFNF.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2024. Vol. 95, p. 250-255
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-113813DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40503ISI: 001229689400001PubMedID: 38775110Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85195173305OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-113813DiVA, id: diva2:1859986
Available from: 2024-05-23 Created: 2024-05-23 Last updated: 2024-06-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Fischer, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fischer, Per
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Acta Orthopaedica
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 25 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf