To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Precision of Fit of Milled Titanium Implant Frameworks (I‐Bridge®) in the Edentulous Jaw
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Postgraduate Dental Education Center, Public Dental Health Service, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9240-5053
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, Sahlgrenska Akademin Göteborg University, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Dentistry - Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Sahlgrenska Akademin, Göteborg University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, ISSN 1523-0899, E-ISSN 1708-8208, Vol. 12, no 2, p. 81-90Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: New computer numeric controlled (CNC)-milled frameworks for implant-supported prostheses have been introduced. However, no data are available on the precision of fit of these new frameworks.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the precision of fit of a new CNC-milled framework technique (I-Bridge, Biomain AB, Helsingborg, Sweden) using Brånemark System (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) and NobelReplace (Nobel Biocare AB) system implants.

Materials and methods: Ten test frameworks were fabricated for one master model for each implant system. Five additional frameworks were fabricated for five different models simulating clinical cases as controls (Brånemark System). The distortion of implant center point positions was measured in x-, y-, and z-axes and in three dimensions by using a contact-type coordinate measuring machine and a computer program developed specifically for this purpose. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare differences of distortion within and between the groups.

Results: The maximal distortion in arch width (x-axis) and curvature (y-axis) was within 71 and 55 microm for all frameworks, respectively. The mean distortion in absolute figures in x-, y-, z-axes and three dimensions was for "clinical control" frameworks 23, 26, 4, and 34 microm as compared with less than 12, 12, 2, and 17 microm for Brånemark and NobelReplace frameworks, respectively. Control frameworks showed significantly (p < .05) greater mean and range of distortions in x- and y-axes and in three dimensions compared with test frameworks.

Conclusion: All measured frameworks presented signs of misfit, indicating that no framework had a "passive fit." Frameworks produced in a more routine clinical environment seem to present greater levels of distortion as compared with frameworks produced in a strict test situation. However, all measured frameworks presented levels of precision of fit within limits considered to be clinically acceptable in earlier studies of frameworks placed on abutments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Vol. 12, no 2, p. 81-90
National Category
Dentistry
Research subject
Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-114516DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00131.xISI: 000277321100001PubMedID: 19076180Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77953745155OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-114516DiVA, id: diva2:1880092
Funder
Region Örebro County
Note

Funding Agencies:

HOGANAS AB

Statisticon AB  

Public Dental Health Service, Orebro County Council

Available from: 2024-06-30 Created: 2024-06-30 Last updated: 2024-07-01Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
2008 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Aims: The aims of this thesis were to analyze reduced number of implants supporting full arch fixed mandibular prostheses and fixed partial dentures (FPDs), non-submerged healing and early loading in the edentulous mandible. A further aim was to evaluate fit of Computer Numerical Controlled (CNC) milled I-Bridge frameworks.

Material & methods: Paper I. One hundred and nineteen patients rehabilitated with full arch mandibular prostheses supported by four implants were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 4.4 years. Paper II. A total of 178 patients provided with FPDs supported by two (n=92) or three implants (n=122) of whom 123 were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 9.4 years. Paper III. Early and delayed loading of full arch mandibular prostheses were evaluated in 109 patients, 54 with delayed loading and 55 with early loading, with a mean follow-up of 3.6 years. Paper IV. Submerged and non-submerged implant placement for supporting fixed prostheses in the edentulous mandible were evaluated after five years in 29 patients. Paper V. The precision of fit of CNC-milled I-Bridge frameworks was evaluated using two different implant systems.

Results: Paper I. The five-year cumulative survival rate (CSR) for implants was 99.1% and for prostheses 100%. Mean bone loss from baseline to five-year follow-up was 0.5 mm. No indication could be found that the number of supporting implants influenced the prosthetic complications. Paper II. The five-year implant and prosthesis CSR was 97.7% for two-implant supported FPDs and 97.3% for three-implant supported FPDs. Mean bone loss at five years was 0.4 mm. Significantly more prosthetic and abutment screw loosening were seen in two-implant supported FPDs. Paper III. Five-year CSR for implants was 94.4% and 92.5% for prostheses in early loading, and 97.9% and 98.0% in the delayed loading group. More prostheses needed adjustment or replacement in the early group, but patients treated with early loading were more pleased with the treatment procedure. Paper IV. Five-year CSR survival rate was 99.4%. Three implants fractured in one patient. Mean bone loss at five years was 0.7 mm in submerged implants and 0.5 mm in non-submerged implants. Paper V. All frameworks demonstrated clinically acceptable fit with mean distortion values within 23 microm (x-axis), 26 microm (y), 4 microm (z- axis) and 34 microm (3-D) for all frameworks. Control frameworks displayed greater levels of distortion than frameworks produced in a strict test situation.

Conclusion: A reduction of the number of supporting implants to four implants in full arch mandibular prostheses and two implants in three unit FPDs in partial edentulous jaws resulted in the same clinical outcome as when more implants are used. Non-submerged implant placement in the edentulous mandible was as predictable as submerged, but early loading of implant-supported mandibular prostheses incurred more prosthetic complications. Computer numerical controlled milled frameworks presented levels of precision of fit within limits considered to be clinically acceptable and superior to earlier published results on cast frameworks.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Göteborgs universitet, 2008. p. 95
Series
Swedish Dental Journal Supplement, ISSN 0348-6672 ; 197
National Category
Dentistry
Research subject
Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-114519 (URN)9789162874674 (ISBN)
Public defence
(Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-07-01 Created: 2024-06-30 Last updated: 2024-07-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Eliasson, Alf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eliasson, Alf
In the same journal
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 45 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf