To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fixed partial prostheses supported by 2 or 3 implants: a retrospective study up to 18 years
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Postgraduate Dental Education Center, Örebro, Sweden; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Sahlgrenska Akademin, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9240-5053
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Postgraduate Dental Education Center, Örebro, Sweden.
Department of Oral Sciences-Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Akademin, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden; Department Biomaterials/Handicap Research, Sahlgrenska Akademin, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
2006 (English)In: International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, ISSN 0882-2786, E-ISSN 1942-4434, Vol. 21, no 4, p. 567-574Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the long-term performance of fixed partial prostheses supported by 2 or 3 implants.

Materials and methods: All patients treated with fixed partial prostheses supported by either 2 or 3 implants during the period 1985 to 1998 were included in this retrospective report. Annual clinical follow-up examinations were performed, with special attention to stability of the prostheses and peri-implant and occlusal conditions. Radiographic examination was performed when the prostheses were delivered (year 0) and subsequently at 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year examinations.

Results: A total of 178 patients had received fixed partial prostheses (FPPs) during this period of whom 123 (77 women and 46 men) were available for follow-up (mean age = 65 years, range 32-91). These 123 patients received a total of 146 implant-supported FPPs (63 two-implant- and 83 three-implant-supported) supported by 375 implants. The mean observation periods for the 2- and 3-implant-supported restorations were 9.6 years and 9.4 years (range, 5 to 18 years), respectively. Survival rates for the 2- and 3-implant-supported prostheses were 96.8% and 97.6%, respectively. The implant survival rate after loading was 98.4% for both groups. The mean bone loss at the 5-year follow-up was 0.3 mm for the 2 groups. No significant differences in bone loss (P > .05), implant failure rate (P > .05), or incidence of mechanical complications (P > .05) were found between the 2 prosthesis designs. The complications differed, significantly, with more loose gold and abutment screws in the 2-implant-supported group (P < .05) and more porcelain fractures in the 3-implant-supported group (P < .05).

Conclusion: The 2-implant-supported partial prostheses exhibited long-term clinical performance comparable to prostheses supported by 3 implants.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Quintessence Publishing , 2006. Vol. 21, no 4, p. 567-574
Keywords [en]
Complications, Dental implants, Dental prostheses, Partially edentulous, Retrospective studies
National Category
Dentistry
Research subject
Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-114517ISI: 000240080100008PubMedID: 16955607Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-33748550640OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-114517DiVA, id: diva2:1880094
Available from: 2024-06-30 Created: 2024-06-30 Last updated: 2024-07-01Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
2008 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Aims: The aims of this thesis were to analyze reduced number of implants supporting full arch fixed mandibular prostheses and fixed partial dentures (FPDs), non-submerged healing and early loading in the edentulous mandible. A further aim was to evaluate fit of Computer Numerical Controlled (CNC) milled I-Bridge frameworks.

Material & methods: Paper I. One hundred and nineteen patients rehabilitated with full arch mandibular prostheses supported by four implants were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 4.4 years. Paper II. A total of 178 patients provided with FPDs supported by two (n=92) or three implants (n=122) of whom 123 were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 9.4 years. Paper III. Early and delayed loading of full arch mandibular prostheses were evaluated in 109 patients, 54 with delayed loading and 55 with early loading, with a mean follow-up of 3.6 years. Paper IV. Submerged and non-submerged implant placement for supporting fixed prostheses in the edentulous mandible were evaluated after five years in 29 patients. Paper V. The precision of fit of CNC-milled I-Bridge frameworks was evaluated using two different implant systems.

Results: Paper I. The five-year cumulative survival rate (CSR) for implants was 99.1% and for prostheses 100%. Mean bone loss from baseline to five-year follow-up was 0.5 mm. No indication could be found that the number of supporting implants influenced the prosthetic complications. Paper II. The five-year implant and prosthesis CSR was 97.7% for two-implant supported FPDs and 97.3% for three-implant supported FPDs. Mean bone loss at five years was 0.4 mm. Significantly more prosthetic and abutment screw loosening were seen in two-implant supported FPDs. Paper III. Five-year CSR for implants was 94.4% and 92.5% for prostheses in early loading, and 97.9% and 98.0% in the delayed loading group. More prostheses needed adjustment or replacement in the early group, but patients treated with early loading were more pleased with the treatment procedure. Paper IV. Five-year CSR survival rate was 99.4%. Three implants fractured in one patient. Mean bone loss at five years was 0.7 mm in submerged implants and 0.5 mm in non-submerged implants. Paper V. All frameworks demonstrated clinically acceptable fit with mean distortion values within 23 microm (x-axis), 26 microm (y), 4 microm (z- axis) and 34 microm (3-D) for all frameworks. Control frameworks displayed greater levels of distortion than frameworks produced in a strict test situation.

Conclusion: A reduction of the number of supporting implants to four implants in full arch mandibular prostheses and two implants in three unit FPDs in partial edentulous jaws resulted in the same clinical outcome as when more implants are used. Non-submerged implant placement in the edentulous mandible was as predictable as submerged, but early loading of implant-supported mandibular prostheses incurred more prosthetic complications. Computer numerical controlled milled frameworks presented levels of precision of fit within limits considered to be clinically acceptable and superior to earlier published results on cast frameworks.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Göteborgs universitet, 2008. p. 95
Series
Swedish Dental Journal Supplement, ISSN 0348-6672 ; 197
National Category
Dentistry
Research subject
Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-114519 (URN)9789162874674 (ISBN)
Public defence
(Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-07-01 Created: 2024-06-30 Last updated: 2024-07-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

PubMedScopusPublisher´s Fulltext

Authority records

Eliasson, Alf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eliasson, Alf
In the same journal
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf