To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Additional Operations Following Sacroiliac Joint Fusions: A Minimum 3-year Follow-up Cohort Study of Patients Operated for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain
Örebro University, School of Medical Sciences. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7376-4664
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Sweden, Uppsala, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Clinical spine surgery, ISSN 2380-0186Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected registry data.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the subsequent pattern of surgeries and outcome of sacroiliac joint fusions (SJF) in patients previously operated in the lumbar spine as well as those scheduled for primary SJF.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with SI joint pain often have a history of previous back surgery, but it is unclear how often patients require back surgery after SI-joint fusion.

METHODS: We obtained data from the national Swedish spine registry on all patients who underwent a SJF between 1998 and 2019 and identified previous and additional operations of any type after a SJF between 1998 and 2022. The EuroQol EQ VAS and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were registered preoperatively and 1 year after the last undergone surgery. Satisfaction with treatment was assessed 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-nine patients underwent SJF between 1998 and 2019. Ninety-five of 279 patients (34%) underwent primary SJF, and 184 of 279 patients (66%) underwent SJF after spine surgery. Forty-one of 95 patients (43%) underwent additional spine or SI-joint surgery after a primary SJF. The most common additional procedure was contralateral SJF (22 of 41; 54%). The mean EQ-VAS change after primary SJF was 19 points (95% CI 12-26), whereas the corresponding value for SJF after previous lumbar spine surgery was 9 points (95% CI 2-16). The corresponding values for the mean ODI change were -14 points (95% CI -19 to -10) and -9 points (95% CI -14 to -4) respectively. Seventy-three percent (37 of 51) and 54% (34 of 63) were satisfied after SJF after primary versus secondary SJF.

CONCLUSION: After primary SJF most additional surgeries are for contralateral symptoms and 9% required lumbar surgery after their SJF. Two-thirds of the patients with SJF have had their surgery after lumbar surgery.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2025.
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-119866DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001791PubMedID: 40066861OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-119866DiVA, id: diva2:1944275
Available from: 2025-03-13 Created: 2025-03-13 Last updated: 2025-03-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Sigmundsson, Freyr Gauti

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sigmundsson, Freyr Gauti
By organisation
School of Medical SciencesÖrebro University Hospital
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 3 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf