oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Knowledge constructions in nursing practice: Understanding and integrating different forms of knowledge
Örebro University, School of Health and Medical Sciences. (Omsorg i livets slut)
Örebro University, School of Health and Medical Sciences. (Omsorg i livets slut)
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
Ersta Skondal Univ Coll, Dept Palliat Care Res, Stockholm, Sweden.
2010 (English)In: Qualitative Health Research, ISSN 1049-7323, E-ISSN 1552-7557, Vol. 20, no 11, 1500-1518 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this combined ethnographic and hermeneutic study we examined which forms of knowledge nurses make use of and how they construct knowledge. We collected data using participant observations, informal conversations, and interviews. Nurses' knowledge construction took the form of a hermeneutic spiral, a journey in which the nurses moved up and down and horizontally, and in which they created understanding. The nurses constructed knowledge from reading the patient's record, the brief oral handover report, greeting the patient, and reading the patient. By being sensitive, using humor, and emotional involvement, they deepened their understanding. By being suspicious and self-critical, they sought interaction with nurse colleagues, the patient, doctor, and relatives, and obtained additional knowledge. They strove throughout the journey to be one step ahead in their efforts to attain an understanding of the patient's situation. We can relate the knowledge nurses make use of to intertwined forms of episteme, techne, and phronesis

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Sage , 2010. Vol. 20, no 11, 1500-1518 p.
Keyword [en]
ethnography, Gadamer, hermeneutics, knowledge construction, nurse practitioners, nursing, Ricoeur
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Nursing Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-9540DOI: 10.1177/1049732310374042ISI: 000283250900008OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-9540DiVA: diva2:291521
Available from: 2010-02-02 Created: 2010-02-02 Last updated: 2017-02-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Bakom rutinerna: kunskap och omvårdnadspraxis i mänskliga gränssituationer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Bakom rutinerna: kunskap och omvårdnadspraxis i mänskliga gränssituationer
2010 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of this thesis was to study how family members, next of kin, and healthcare professionals construct and use knowledge in nursing praxis in human boundarysituations.The study was carried out on a surgical ward at a university hospital in Sweden.Methodology: Study I: A case study; data concerning a family with six familymembers were collected over 10 months using interviews, conversations, and diary notations.Study II: A hermeneutic approach; interviews with 27 family carers were conductedsix to eight months after a family member’s death. Studies III, IV: a combinedethnographic and hermeneutic approach; participant observations (285 hours), informalconversations (190), and interviews (25) were conducted with 25 nurses and 18 assistant nurses.

The main findings were: (I) The family members used beliefs to explain and understandcancer, dying and death. The beliefs were aggregated into eight main beliefs and fourthemes: cancer is a deadly threat/death is a liberator; death can be held at bay/death canbe lived near; dying is done alone/dying should not be done alone; and life has anend/life is endless. These beliefs appear to oscillate between seemingly contrastingpoles. (II) The family carers made their own assessment of their loved one’s conditionand situation. Their actions were characterized by struggling to get treatment, being leftbehind, being partners, keeping the illness at a distance, hovering beside their loved one,waiting for death, and being experts and protectors. The family carers used practicalwisdom, phronesis, regarding what care was the best, or least harmful, for their lovedone in the encounter with professional care. (III) The nurses constructed knowledgethrough greeting the patient, and reading the patient. By being sensitive, using humor,and emotional involvement, understanding was deepened. By being suspicious and selfcritical,interaction was sought with nurse colleagues, the patient, relatives, and the doctor,and additional knowledge was obtained. They strived to be one step ahead in theirefforts to attain an understanding of the patient´s situation. The knowledge nurses makeuse of can be related to the intertwined and embodied forms of theoretical knowledge,i.e., episteme, practical professional knowledge, i.e., techne, and practical wisdom i.e.,phronesis. (IV) The nurses created and used emotional knowing that could be interpretedin relation to various rooms of emotions, thoughts and actions. They strived to dothings correctly in the normative room; created a safe, secure milieu for patients andnext of kin in the safety-security room; and questioned their actions in the critical room.They created an affinity for co-operation that was of benefit in encounters with patientsin the nurses’ affinity room. And they demonstrated compassion for patients and next ofkin; this compassion was particularly evident in the closeness room.Conclusion: In praxis, construction and use of knowledge occurs that often takes placebehind the routines. This knowledge constitutes an important content in nursing. Thehermeneutic spiral can serve a pedagogic purpose in elucidating nursing and its differentforms of knowledge.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro universitet, 2010. 104 p.
Series
Örebro Studies in Care Sciences, ISSN 1652-1153 ; 27
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Nursing Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-9542 (URN)978-91-7668-711-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2010-01-22, Hörsal P2, Örebro universitet, Örebro, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-02-02 Created: 2010-02-02 Last updated: 2014-12-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
James, IngerAndershed, BirgittaGustavsson, Bernt
By organisation
School of Health and Medical SciencesSchool of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences
In the same journal
Qualitative Health Research
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 330 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf