To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Utredningsmetodik, tankefel och källkritik i ett psykologutlåtande i ett umgängesmål. Grovt missbruk av psykologi av psykolog.
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
2009 (Swedish)Report (Other academic)Alternative title
Critical examination of a child psychological investigation (English)
Abstract [en]

Syftet är att kritiskt-vetenskapligt granska ett psykologutlåtande med avseende på utredningsmetodik, tankefel och källkritik. Ett stort antal brister och tankefel klargörs och det kan konstateras att utlåtandet är ett falsarium. Bland annat har icke vetenskapligt grundad s.k. projektiv metodik (Erica, Machover, CAT) missbrukats. En omfattande lista med tankefel i utlåtandet redovisas. Det granskade utlåtandet bifogas i bilaga.

Abstract [en]

A child psychological investigation with projective methods is critically examined and judged to be a forgery. A large number of cognitive errors are clarified.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. , p. 17
Keywords [en]
child psychological investigation, projective methods, cognitive biases, critical thinking, forgery
Keywords [sv]
utredning, utlåtande, psykologutlåtande, utredningsmetodik, tankefel, källkritik, kritiskt tänkande, projektiva test, projektiva metoder, CAT, Machover, Erica, Rorschach, umgänge, barn, saklighet, objektivitet, subjektivitet, tolkning, tolkningsproblem, partiskhet, falsarium, bluff, konflikt, undanhålla informanter
National Category
Social Work Applied Psychology Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Psychology; socialt arbete; Law; Child and Youth Psychiatry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-10094OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-10094DiVA, id: diva2:304566
Note
Domstolen påtalade med hänvisning till granskningen det stora antalet tankefel. Available from: 2010-03-19 Created: 2010-03-18 Last updated: 2017-10-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(71 kB)1214 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 71 kBChecksum SHA-512
e595d966721b11e39b7dc4a49d2cfb0b8f97af5382a4f232d9e4733f54ea8fe23bed45740e83766ff25615eb0d2d0dd1c93aa563ffc5762ea90663148ed34f54
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Edvardsson, Bo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edvardsson, Bo
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work
Social WorkApplied PsychologyLaw (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1215 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 261 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf