oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Institutet beslag: vid brottsutredning
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
2010 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this paper is to explore what objects that can be seized and how the management of a seizure should be conducted. Ability to take enforcement against an individual should be carefully weighed against the rights and freedoms that exist. Seizure is one of the various restraints that exist, and the regulation on which they appear is mainly in the Code of Judicial Procedure, Chapter 27th. To be able to apply coercive measures, it is fundamental prerequisite that a criminal investigation is initiated, but there exist some significant exceptions to this. There are also rules about who has the right to provide for the seizure, the decision can be taken by a prosecutor, an investigator, a police officer or, in special cases, the court. The purpose of a seizure is mainly to secure the subject of a criminal investigation, to secure objects that have been arrogated or to secure future forfeiture. Therefore it is only possible to seize objects that are relevant to a criminal investigation, and it is only movable property such as written documents or electronic objects that can be seized. Items that have been seized should be handled in accordance with the laws that exist. A protocol shall be established and supervision shall be exercised over the seizure and a seizure should end when it is no longer relevant to the criminal investigation. The regulation has recently changed and that created new improved opportunities, but despite that, the area is complex and constantly evolving technology makes it difficult.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , 57 p.
Keyword [sv]
Straffprocessuella tvångsmedel, Beslag
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-10907ISRN: ORU-JPS/RÄT-AG-2010/0024--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-10907DiVA: diva2:322054
Presentation
(English)
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2010-06-23 Created: 2010-06-03 Last updated: 2010-06-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(428 kB)876 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 428 kBChecksum SHA-512
44cce7c9eb275df46576a488deab1c7f1142a897e41146e44c47e229eec266755a106db9d5f18d3290fdd5462af5687a46f8bc6a1a5acefc2ec365fc8f9e6316
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Alros, Madelaine
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 876 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 434 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf