oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Primary surgery of genital prolapse: a shift in treatment tradition
Örebro University, Department of Clinical Medicine.
2006 (English)In: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-6349, E-ISSN 1600-0412, Vol. 85, no 9, 1104-1108 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The use of complete repairs in genital prolapse surgery has been questioned because of the possible adverse effects of the surgery on the urogenital and sexual function and selective repairs have been advocated. The aims of this study were to establish information about genital prolapse surgery and to analyze whether a shift from extensive prolapse surgery with complete repairs to selective repairs occurred during a 10-year period. METHODS: A retrospective study of 610 consecutive patients operated upon for genital prolapse during 1983 (Period I) and 1993 (Period II) in a sample of three Swedish hospitals was conducted. Data were obtained from the patient records. 542 women had primary surgery and were analyzed with emphasis on demographic, clinical, and surgical data. RESULTS: The demographic and clinical data of the patients showed no significant differences between the two periods. In Period I, 69% of the patients underwent complete repair compared with 37% in Period II (p<0.001). The proportion of prolapse operations without posterior colporrhaphy increased significantly from the first to the second period from 14 to 43% (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The surgery for genital prolapse seems to have changed from complete repairs towards selective repairs and posterior colporrhaphy was more often avoided in the second period. The implication of this shift in surgical treatment on pelvic floor function is not known. Further studies are needed to disclose the effect of the surgery on pelvic floor function and dysfunction in the long term.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 85, no 9, 1104-1108 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine
Research subject
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-11116DOI: 10.1080/00016340500470168PubMedID: 16929416OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-11116DiVA: diva2:324941
Available from: 2010-06-16 Created: 2010-06-16 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Nilsson, Kerstin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nilsson, Kerstin
By organisation
Department of Clinical Medicine
In the same journal
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Medical and Health SciencesObstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 26 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf