oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intensive forestry in Sweden: stakeholders' evaluation of benefits and risk
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden. (centrum för urbana och regionala studier)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6735-0011
Oslo university, Norway.
Oslo university, Norway.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, ISSN 1943-815X, E-ISSN 1943-8168, Vol. 10, no 4, 145-160 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There is growing consensus about the need to develop sustainable use of forest resources, but no consensus about how to interpret and implement this goal. Political institutions, governmental agencies, forest companies, and environmental organizations have partly different views on what sustainable forestry means and what strategies to use to achieve it. Not least, the climate change issue has put higher and partly new demands on forests, both as providers of biomass and as carbon sinks, which may be in conflict with other services of the forest’s ecosystem. This paper analyses how different Swedish stakeholders evaluate the possibilities for intensive forestry, that is, to increase the production of woody biomass through increased use of fertilizers, improved genetic material, the introduction of exotic tree species, and the use of fastgrowing deciduous tree species. The analysis shows that the pros and cons are evaluated differently, with some stakeholders assessing intensive forestry as a radical break from the current goal of sustainable forestry and others viewing it as according with it. It is concluded that this conflict should be understood as concerning not competing knowledge claims, but competing frames – schemes of interpretation through which the complexity of reality is reduced. This means that the solution is not to be found in improved knowledge but in increased awareness that the involved frames are the source of the conflict.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Taylor & Francis, 2013. Vol. 10, no 4, 145-160 p.
Keyword [en]
intensive forestry, framing, Swedish Forestry Model, biodiversity, climate
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology) Forest Science
Research subject
Sociology; Biologi med ekologisk inriktning; Enviromental Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-32155DOI: 10.1080/1943815X.2013.841261ISI: 000328243000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84890546800OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-32155DiVA: diva2:659552
Projects
Future Forests
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
Note

Funding agency:

Forestry Research Institute of Sweden (Skogforsk) 

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) 

Umea University 

Available from: 2013-10-25 Created: 2013-10-25 Last updated: 2017-01-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Intensive forestry(206 kB)231 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 206 kBChecksum SHA-512
3d9f237c786b9d8721a764c3f3bcea7bf97815333264ed88ee31193ca5c36568c82dee1a20a7bc174bc98d2ef879335230091ea3e948ac595666cdd3a9df44ed
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lidskog, Rolf
By organisation
School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden
In the same journal
Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)Forest Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 231 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 344 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf