To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Local anesthetics administered intra-peritoneally have predominant localand not central analgesic effect: a randomized, double blind study
Örebro University, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden.
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistical Unit, Clinical Research Center.
Örebro University, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6128-7752
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background It remains unclear whether the analgesic effect of intraperitoneal local anesthetics (LA) is via local intraperitoneal or central mechanisms. This double blind, randomized study was performed to test the hypothesis that LA given intraperitoneally (IP) are superior to the same dose administered by continuous IV infusion (IV) for treating postoperative pain.

Methods A multi-hole catheter was placed intraperitoneally at the end of the surgery in 60 patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy. The patients were randomized to: Group IV: a continuous infusion of lidocaine 50 mg/h (10 ml) IV and saline 10 ml/h intermittently IP

Group IP: an injection of lidocaine 50 mg/h (10ml) once every hour IP and a continuous infusion of saline 10 ml/h IV. Group P: saline 10 ml/h both as continuous IV infusion and intermittent IP injection. Postoperative morphine consumption, pain intensity, recovery parameters, home discharge and lidocaine concentrations were measured.

Results

Morphine consumption during 0-24h was lower in Group IP vs. Group IV, mean difference - 22.6 mg (95% CI, 11.4 to 33.8, p < 0.01). No difference was seen between Group IV and Group P in analgesic consumption. The total mean plasma concentration of lidocaine in Group IP was significantly lower than in Group IV, 0 - 4.5h postoperatively (p = 0.03). Pain intensity, recovery parameters and time to home discharge were similar between the groups.

Conclusion The lower supplemental morphine consumption coupled with a lower plasma lidocaine concentration following intraperitoneal administration would confirm a predominant local rather than central effect of local anesthetics.

Keywords [en]
local anesthetics, postoperative pain, abdominal hysterectomy
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Research subject
Anaesthesiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-32194OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-32194DiVA, id: diva2:660337
Note

Fant F. is said to be one of the authors to this article (in the "Original studies", p.11) in the dissertation. This is most likely an error. 

Available from: 2013-10-29 Created: 2013-10-29 Last updated: 2017-10-17Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. A new technique for postoperative pain management with local anesthetic after abdominal hysterectomy
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A new technique for postoperative pain management with local anesthetic after abdominal hysterectomy
2013 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

An abdominal hysterectomy (AH) is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. In this thesis, a new technique for postoperative pain managment has been studied in 200 patients: local anesthetic (LA) was administered intraperitoneally (IP) after elective AH.

In study I, the efficacy of an IP continuous infusion of LA given postoperatively via a catheter was compared with a placebo. The conclusion was that the postoperative pain relief was significantly improved when LA was used. The plasma concentration of LA was far below toxic concentrations.

In study II, when three different doses of LA were given at a constant infusion rate, the conclusion was that satisfactory analgesia could be achieved with low doses of LA and that no advantages were seen when higher doses of LA were administered. The highest dose of infused LA did not result in toxic plasma concentration.

Study III compared a continuous IP infusion and a patient-controlled bo-lus IP injection of LA. A significant opioid-sparing effect combined with lower required amount of LA was found when the patient-controlled LA was administered compared to the continuous infusion. This was associated with a faster return of gastrointestinal function and home readiness.

Study IV tested the hypothesis that the analgesic effect of LA given intermittently IP was superior compared to the same dose administered continuously by intravenous (IV) infusion. A significant opioid-sparing effect was found when an intermittent IP injection of lidocaine was administered. The venous blood concentration of LA was significantly lower in the IP intermittent group versus the IV group. The lower supplemental morphine consumption, coupled with the lower plasma lidocaine concentration, may confirm a local peripheral rather than a systemic effect of LA administered IP.

In conclusion, when the LA was injected continuously IP, a significant opioid- sparing effect was found, which did not increase by increasing the LA dose. The opioid-sparing effect was greater when the intermittent IP injection of LA was compared to a continuous infusion. When LA was administered IP, the mechanism of pain relief seemed to be a local rather than a central effect.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro universitet, 2013. p. 65
Series
Örebro Studies in Medicine, ISSN 1652-4063 ; 94
Keywords
local anesthetics, postoperative pain, abdominal hysterectomy, intra-peritoneal, catheter, Lidocaine, Levobupivacaine
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Surgery
Research subject
Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-30851 (URN)978-91-7668-967-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2013-11-08, Wilandersalen, Universitetssjukhuset Örebro, S. Grev Rosengatan, 703 62 Örebro, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2013-09-18 Created: 2013-09-18 Last updated: 2017-10-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Perniola, AndreaAxelsson, KjellGupta, Anil

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Perniola, AndreaAxelsson, KjellGupta, Anil
By organisation
School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 126 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf