To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Chest physiotherapy after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a comparison of three different deep breathing techniques
Örebro University, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden. Department of Physiotherapy, Örebro Medical Centre Hospital, Örebro, Sweden .ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8363-1662
Department of Neuroscience, Section of Physiotherapy, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden .
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Örebro Medical Centre Hospital, Örebro, Sweden .
Department of Thoracic Anaesthesia and Clinical Psychology, Section of Physiotherapy, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden .
2001 (English)In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1650-1977, E-ISSN 1651-2081, Vol. 33, no 2, p. 79-84Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The effectiveness of three deep breathing techniques was evaluated in 98 male patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in a randomized trial. The techniques examined were deep breathing with a blow bottle-device, an inspiratory resistance-positive expiratory pressure mask (IR-PEP) and performed with no mechanical device. Pulmonary function and roentgenological changes were evaluated. Four days post-operatively there were significantly decreased vital capacity, inspiratory capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, functional residual capacity, total lung capacity and single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity in all three groups (p < 0.0001). No major differences between the treatment groups were found, but the impairment in pulmonary function tended to be less marked using the blow bottle technique. The Blow bottle group had significantly less reduction in total lung capacity (p = 0.01) compared to the Deep breathing group, while the IR-PEP group did not significantly differ from the other two groups.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2001. Vol. 33, no 2, p. 79-84
Keywords [en]
Coronary artery bypass; Physical therapy; Positive-pressure respiration; Post-operative complications; Respiratory function tests; Thoracic surgery
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-34056DOI: 10.1080/165019701750098920ISI: 000167583400005PubMedID: 11474953Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0035046484OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-34056DiVA, id: diva2:702994
Available from: 2014-03-05 Created: 2014-03-05 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Westerdahl, Elisabeth

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Westerdahl, Elisabeth
By organisation
School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden
In the same journal
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 682 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf