oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Comparison of Species Richness and Traits of Riparian Plants between a Main River Channel and Its Tributaries
Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4384-5014
Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0628-4203
Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
1994 (English)In: Journal of Ecology, ISSN 0022-0477, E-ISSN 1365-2745, Vol. 82, no 2, 281-295 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Summary

1 We examined differences in species richness and frequencies of vascular plants in the riverbank vegetation between the main channel of the Vindel River system and seven of its tributaries which spanned the same biogeographic range.

2 Species richness per site was higher in the main channel than in the tributaries, both as a whole and for many species groups. The proportions of woody plants (phanerophytes and chamaephytes), geophytes, and natural species were higher in the tributaries, while the proportions of hemicryptophytes, ruderals, and short-floating species (i.e. species unable to float > 1 day) were higher in the main channel. Both types of river had species that were more than twice as frequent there than in the other category.

3 The main channel had a high species richness at intermediate altitudes whereas the tributaries had least species at intermediate altitudes. Except for the highest altitudes, the tributaries also had a generally lower mean species richness than the main channel.

4 Stepwise multiple regression analyses using 15 predictor variables explained stat- istically up to 85% of the floristic variation in the river system. Mean annual discharge and number of substrates explained most of the variation in five equations each, while peat cover explained most of the variation in four equations, and altitude and silt cover in one equation each. Mean annual discharge, peat cover and silt cover differed between the main channel and the tributaries and could therefore be responsible for the observed difference.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1994. Vol. 82, no 2, 281-295 p.
Keyword [en]
number of species, riverbanks, river system, Sweden, vascular plant
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-37415DOI: 10.2307/2261296ISI: A1994NV17600007OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-37415DiVA: diva2:751937
Available from: 2014-10-02 Created: 2014-10-02 Last updated: 2016-12-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ekblad, AlfDynesius, MatsJansson, Roland
In the same journal
Journal of Ecology
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 221 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf