To Örebro University

oru.seÖrebro University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A method to visualize and adjust for selection bias in prevalent cohort studies
Department of Epidemiology, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Solna, Sweden.
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biosta- tistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7248-0910
Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: American Journal of Epidemiology, ISSN 0002-9262, E-ISSN 1476-6256, Vol. 174, no 8, p. 969-76Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Selection bias and confounding are concerns in cohort studies where the reason for inclusion of subjects in the cohort may be related to the outcome of interest. Selection bias in prevalent cohorts is often corrected by excluding observation time and events during the first time period after inclusion in the cohort. This time period must be chosen carefully-long enough to minimize selection bias but not too long so as to unnecessarily discard observation time and events. A novel method visualizing and estimating selection bias is described and exemplified by using 2 real cohort study examples: a study of hepatitis C virus infection and a study of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. The method is based on modeling the hazard for the outcome of interest as a function of time since inclusion in the cohort. The events studied were "hospitalizations for kidney-related disease" in the hepatitis C virus cohort and "death" in the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance cohort. Both cohorts show signs of considerable selection bias as evidenced by increased hazard in the time period after inclusion in the cohort. The method was very useful in visualizing selection bias and in determining the initial time period to be excluded from the analyses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 174, no 8, p. 969-76
Keywords [en]
cohort studies; cubic spline; epidemiologic methods; hepatitis C; monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; selection bias
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Research subject
Public health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-37600DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr211ISI: 000295679700012PubMedID: 21920949Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-80054074969OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-37600DiVA, id: diva2:753546
Note

Funding Agency:

Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control  

Available from: 2014-10-08 Created: 2014-10-08 Last updated: 2018-05-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Duberg, Ann-Sofi

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Duberg, Ann-Sofi
In the same journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 695 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf