oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An experimental examination of catastrophizing-related interpretation bias for ambiguous facial expressions of pain using an incidental learning task
Research Group on Health Psychology, Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work. Research Group on Health Psychology, Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9462-0256
Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Research Group on Health Psychology, Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
2014 (English)In: Frontiers in Psychology, ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 5, 1002- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Individuals with pain-related concerns are likely to interpret ambiguous pain-related information in a threatening manner. It is unknown whether this interpretation bias also occurs for ambiguous pain-related facial expressions. This study examined whether individuals who habitually attach a catastrophic meaning to pain are characterized by negative interpretation bias for ambiguous pain-related facial expressions. Sixty-four female undergraduates completed an incidental learning task during which pictures of faces were presented, each followed by a visual target at one of two locations. Participants indicated target location by pressing one of two response keys. During the learning phase, happy and painful facial expressions predicted target location. During two test phases, morphed facial expressions of pain and happiness were added, equally often followed by a target at either location. Faster responses following morphs to targets at the location predicted by painful expressions compared to targets at the location predicted by happy expressions were taken to reflect pain-related interpretation bias. During one test phase, faces were preceded by either a safe or threatening context cue. High, but not low, pain-catastrophizers responded faster following morphs to targets at the location predicted by painful expressions than to targets at the other location (when participants were aware of the contingency between expression type and target location). When context cues were presented, there was no indication of interpretation bias. Participants were also asked to directly classify the facial expressions that were presented during the incidental learning task. Participants classified morphs more often as happy than as painful, independent of their level of pain catastrophizing. This observation is discussed in terms of differences between indirect and direct measures of interpretation bias.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 5, 1002- p.
Keyword [en]
painful facial expressions, interpretation bias, indirect measures, incidental learning task, direct measures, pain catastrophizing
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-37675DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01002ISI: 000341860500001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-37675DiVA: diva2:754887
Available from: 2014-10-13 Created: 2014-10-13 Last updated: 2017-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schrooten, Martien G. S.
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work
In the same journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 258 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf