oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of wireless 48-h (Bravo) versus traditional ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring
Department of Surgery, Center of Gastrointestinal Disease, Ersta Hospital; Karolinska Institutet, Department for Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm.
Department of Radiology, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm.
Department of Radiology, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm.
Department of Surgery, Center of Gastrointestinal Disease, Ersta Hospital; Karolinska Institutet, Department for Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2636-4745
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology, ISSN 1502-7708, Vol. 44, no 3, p. 276-83Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To compare wireless with catheter-based esophageal pH recordings.

Material and methods: Forty-five patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease and 47 healthy volunteers were investigated in a university-affiliated hospital; 48-h wireless esophageal pH recording was performed. During the first 24 h, simultaneous traditional pH recording by catheter was undertaken. Nine of the volunteers underwent repeated measurements with both techniques. Outcome measures were feasibility, agreement, concordance of diagnostic yield, reproducibility, and subjective symptoms.

Results: Subjective parameters were less affected when using the wireless technique alone (p<0.05). On using the wireless technique, esophageal acid exposure was underestimated approximately by half compared with traditional recording (p<0.05). Although pH data obtained with the two techniques were correlated (r(2)=0.66, p<0.001), the range between limits of agreement was wide (-3.7 to 10.0 percentage units of total time pH <4). Coefficients of variation for repeated measurements were 60.1+/-26.3% for catheter recordings, and 66.0+/-47.3 for wireless recordings on day 1 (NS). Concordance of diagnostic yield was 81.5% with all subjects included.

Conclusions: Forty-eight-hour wireless Bravo pH monitoring is feasible but consistently underestimates esophageal acid exposure compared to the conventional technique. Although there is a significant correlation between the two techniques for pH recordings, the wide range in limits of agreement and the large coefficient of variation with both techniques suggest that the two methods are not immediately interchangeable for use in clinical practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oslo, Norway: Taylor & Francis, 2009. Vol. 44, no 3, p. 276-83
Keywords [en]
Esophagus, GERD, pH monitoring
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-40286DOI: 10.1080/00365520802588109ISI: 000263444000004PubMedID: 19040176Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-61649119015OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-40286DiVA, id: diva2:776761
Available from: 2015-01-08 Created: 2015-01-08 Last updated: 2017-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Ljungqvist, Olle

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ljungqvist, Olle
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 290 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf