oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection
Department of Surgery, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Karolinska Institute, Clintec, Division of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm; Centre of Gastrointestinal Disease, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm.
Karolinska Institute, Clintec, Division of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm; Centre of Gastrointestinal Disease, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm.
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)In: British Journal of Surgery, ISSN 0007-1323, E-ISSN 1365-2168, Vol. 94, no 2, 224-31 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Single-centre studies have suggested that enhanced recovery can be achieved with multimodal perioperative care protocols. This international observational study evaluated the implementation of an enhanced recovery programme in five European centres and examined the determinants affecting recovery and length of hospital stay.

Methods: Four hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing elective open colorectal resection above the peritoneal reflection between January 2001 and January 2004 were enrolled in a protocol that defined multiple perioperative care elements. One centre had been developing multimodal perioperative care for 10 years, whereas the other four had previously undertaken traditional care.

Results: The case mix was similar between centres. Protocol compliance before and during the surgical procedure was high, but it was low in the immediate postoperative phase. Patients fulfilled predetermined recovery criteria a median of 3 days after operation but were actually discharged a median of 5 days after surgery. Delay in discharge and the development of major complications prolonged length of stay. Previous experience with fast-track surgery was associated with a shorter hospital stay.

Conclusion: Functional recovery in 3 days after colorectal resection could be achieved in daily practice. A protocol is not enough to enable discharge of patients on the day of functional recovery; more experience and better organization of care may be required.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, 2007. Vol. 94, no 2, 224-31 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-40517DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5468PubMedID: 17205493Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-33847351179OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-40517DiVA: diva2:777419
Available from: 2015-01-08 Created: 2015-01-08 Last updated: 2016-05-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ljungqvist, Olle
In the same journal
British Journal of Surgery
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 228 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf