oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Radiological findings do not support lateral residual tumour as a major cause of local recurrence of rectal cancer
Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm.
Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm.
Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm.
Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2636-4745
Show others and affiliations
2006 (English)In: British Journal of Surgery, ISSN 0007-1323, E-ISSN 1365-2168, Vol. 93, no 1, 113-9 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the sites of local recurrence following radical (R0) total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer in an effort to elucidate the reasons for recurrence.

Methods: Thirty-seven patients with recurrence following curative resection for rectal cancer were identified from a population of 880 patients operated on by surgeons trained in the TME procedure. Two radiologists independently examined 33 available computed tomograms and magnetic resonance images taken when the recurrence was detected.

Results: Twenty-nine of the 33 recurrences were found in the lower two-thirds of the pelvis. Two recurrent tumours appeared to originate from lateral pelvic lymph nodes. Evidence of residual mesorectal fat was identified in 15 patients. Fourteen of the recurrent tumours originated from primary tumours in the upper rectum; all of these tumours recurred at the anastomosis and 12 of the 14 patients had evidence of residual mesorectal fat.

Conclusion: Lateral pelvic lymph node metastases are not a major cause of local recurrence after TME. Partial mesorectal excision may be associated with an increased risk of local recurrence from tumours in the upper rectum.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, 2006. Vol. 93, no 1, 113-9 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-40532DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5233PubMedID: 16372254Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-30944458579OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-40532DiVA: diva2:777464
Available from: 2015-01-08 Created: 2015-01-08 Last updated: 2016-05-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ljungqvist, Olle
In the same journal
British Journal of Surgery
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 222 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf