oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Why we keep separating the ‘inseparable’: Dialecticizing intersectionality
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden. (Centre for feminist social studies)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7766-8696
2017 (English)In: The European Journal of Women's Studies, ISSN 1350-5068, E-ISSN 1461-7420, Vol. 24, no 2, 114-127 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Disputes about how to understand intersectional relations often pivot around the tension between separateness and inseparability, where some scholars emphasise the need to separate between different intersectional categories while others claim they are inseparable. In this article I take issue with the either/or thinking that underpins what I see as an unnecessary and unproductive polarization in the debate over the in/separability of intersectional categories. Drawing on Roy Bhaskar’s dialectical critical realist philosophy, I argue that we can think of intersectional categories as well as different ontological levels as both distinct and unified and elaborate on the significance of the dialectical notion of unity-in-difference for intersectional studies. As part of the argument I address the issue of what it actually means for something to be distinct or separate as opposed to inseparable or unified with something else, demonstrating that lack of clarity about this is at the heart of polarized arguments about separateness versus inseparability in intersectionality theory.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2017. Vol. 24, no 2, 114-127 p.
Keyword [en]
Analytical distinctions, anticategorical intersectionality, critical realism, dialectical critical realism, dialectics, feminist theory, intersectionality, intra-action, ontology, unity-in-difference
National Category
Gender Studies
Research subject
Gender Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-42872DOI: 10.1177/1350506815577114ISI: 000400077200002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85018384507OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-42872DiVA: diva2:789832
Projects
Feminist Theorizings of Intersectionality, Transversal Dialogues and New Synergies
Funder
Swedish Research Council
Available from: 2015-02-20 Created: 2015-02-20 Last updated: 2017-05-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Fulltext(146 kB)190 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT03.pdfFile size 146 kBChecksum SHA-512
889acd03372d91159bcddbe66ce376794adc665254b901c9e0f7ac7e40d5747f84d3134551e2308baf29d77b0715f5d065c8b4647f9a941f53382c04a41d4a76
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gunnarsson, Lena
By organisation
School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden
In the same journal
The European Journal of Women's Studies
Gender Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 281 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 762 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf