oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implicit men in traffic safety discourse: A life course perspective on (auto)mobility, violations and interventions
Filosofiska fakulteten, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5268-8957
2007 (English)In: Norma, ISSN 1890-2138, E-ISSN 1890-2146, Vol. 2, no 2, 127-143 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Sweden is the first country in the world to have introduced the so-called Vision Zero (Nollvisionen): an ethical approach suggesting that road safety cannot be traded for mobility. Policy writings on traffic safety have so far been very limited in terms of explicitly addressing risk taking practices as mainly performed by men or as a way of performing masculinities. In this article I discuss how the gender-neutral language in traffic safety policy constructs adulthood as signifying maturity and good driving practices. In traffic safety policy, implicit adult men are contrasted against the young(er) drivers who are constructed as problematic to traffic safety. Rather than being about maturity or something that ‘just happens’ I suggest understanding (dangerous) driving as a repertoire for some men to perform masculinities linking it with power and entitlement.

Still, not only dangerous driving practices per se are problematic to road safety. I argue that automobility needs to be understood as much more thoroughly affecting everyday life than is acknowledged in traffic safety discourse. A way of acknowledging the multiplicity of experiences and effects from automobility is to view it as a ‘process of damaging’. This perspective takes into consideration how automobility simultaneously enables and disables ‘safe’ mobility along lines of gender, age and able-bodiedness. Despite the fact that these problematic effects to some extent are acknowledged in policy, automobility remains a privileged mode of transportation in contemporary Sweden.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oslo: Universitetsforlaget AS , 2007. Vol. 2, no 2, 127-143 p.
Keyword [en]
Automobility, gender, masculinity, age, able-bodiedness, traffic safety, policy, Vision Zero/Nollvisionen, violation
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Gender Studies
Research subject
Gender Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-47438OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-47438DiVA: diva2:894744
Available from: 2009-10-10 Created: 2016-01-15 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Balkmar, Dag

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Balkmar, Dag
In the same journal
Norma
Social Sciences InterdisciplinaryGender Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 318 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf