oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Analytical evaluation of nine serological assays for diagnosis of syphilis
Örebro University, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden. Department of Laboratory Medicine.
Örebro University, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden. Department of Laboratory Medicine.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4522-3078
Örebro University, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, ISSN 0926-9959, E-ISSN 1468-3083, Vol. 29, no 12, p. 2369-2376Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Background: The diagnosis of syphilis is most frequently dependent on antibody detection with serological assays. Assays for both treponemal and non-treponemal antibodies are needed to provide a sensitive and specific diagnosis. For decades, a first screening has been done with non-treponemal assays, followed by treponemal. However, in recent years, following laboratory automation, the reverse sequence screening algorithms have been developed, using a treponemal assay as the initial screening test.

Objective: To evaluate serological assays for treponemal and non-treponemal antibodies, to use in reverse algorithm screening of syphilis.

Material and methods: Six treponemal assays (one IgM-specific assay), two non-treponemal assays and one novel dual point-of-care (POC) assay for serological diagnosis of syphilis were evaluated. Serum samples from Guinea-Bissau and Sweden were examined, as well as two performance panels and samples from blood donors. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each assay, using different assays as gold standard test.

Results: The Macro-Vue RPR Card test was the most sensitive non-treponemal test and the TrepSure Anti-Treponema EIA Screen and the SeroDia TP-PA were the most sensitive and specific treponemal assays. Among the automated assays, both the Liaison Treponema Screen and Architect Syphilis TP showed high sensitivity, however, the former had clearly higher specificity.

Conclusions: In resourced settings, where the reverse sequence algorithm is preferred for screening, an automated treponemal immunoassay for initial screening subsequently followed by the TrepSure test or TP-PA assay as a second treponemal assay appear highly effective. Finally, a quantitative highly sensitive non-treponemal assay, e.g. the Macro-Vue RPR Card test, could then be used as a supplementary test to evaluate activity of the syphilis infection.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell, 2015. Vol. 29, no 12, p. 2369-2376
National Category
Dermatology and Venereal Diseases
Research subject
Dermatology and Venerology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-47858DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13237ISI: 000367682300012PubMedID: 26370737OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-47858DiVA, id: diva2:899287
Note

Funding Agencies:

Örebro County Council Research Committee

Foundation for Medical Research at Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden

Available from: 2016-02-01 Created: 2016-02-01 Last updated: 2018-07-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Malm, KerstinAndersson, SörenFredlund, HansUnemo, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Malm, KerstinAndersson, SörenFredlund, HansUnemo, Magnus
By organisation
School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden
In the same journal
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Dermatology and Venereal Diseases

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 112 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf