oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The "black box" problem in the study of participation
Postdoctoral Fellow of the Research Foundation—Flanders, Centre for Sociological Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Political Science, Åbo Akademi University, Finland.
2009 (English)In: Journal of Civil Society, ISSN 1744-8689, E-ISSN 1744-8697, Vol. 5, no 3, 209-226 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research on citizen participation has been guided by two core issues: first, the observation of a widening repertory of modes of participation, and second, the argument that participation is not an undifferentiated phenomenon, but must be conceived as an inherently multidimensional reality. In this article, we argue that conventional participation research has focused too one-sidedly on quantitatively expanding the range of types of activities, while the complex dimensionality is not reflected in the measures used. We formulate a methodological critique by using the metaphor of the ‘black box’, which refers to the implicit and unquestioned assumption that distinct types of activities and associations represent homogeneous and consistent realities that do not warrant further analytical decomposition. Surveys of participation allocate individuals to different ‘participation boxes’ by means of a binary logic, leaving a void of what is actually happening inside the boxes. To conclude, we reflect upon the fundamental dilemmas the black box of participation raises for theory and research, and offer conceptual and methodological keys to unlock the participation box.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2009. Vol. 5, no 3, 209-226 p.
Keyword [en]
participation, conceptual developments, survey research, methodological critique, triangulation
National Category
Political Science Sociology
Research subject
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-48061DOI: 10.1080/17448680903351693OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-48061DiVA: diva2:901134
Available from: 2016-02-06 Created: 2016-02-06 Last updated: 2017-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Denk, Thomas
In the same journal
Journal of Civil Society
Political ScienceSociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 242 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf