oru.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implant-Supported Single Crowns Replacing Congenitally Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors: A 5-Year Follow-Up
Specialist Clinic of Orthodontics, Public Dental Health Service, Karlstad, Sweden.
Örebro University, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden. Örebro University Hospital. Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Postgraduate Dental Education Center, Region Örebro County, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9240-5053
Örebro University, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden. Örebro University Hospital. Dental Research Department, Public Dental Health Service, Örebro County Council, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University Hospital. Department of Orthodontics, Postgraduate Dental Education Center, Örebro, Sweden.
2015 (English)In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, ISSN 1523-0899, E-ISSN 1708-8208, Vol. 17, no 6, p. 1134-1140Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Background: Knowledge of the long-term survival of single implants in cases of congenitally missing lateral incisors in the maxilla is limited.

Purpose: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the 5-year survival of implants and implant-supported crowns (ISCs) and to assess the functional and aesthetic outcomes from the professional and patient perspectives.

Materials and Methods: From a total of 46 patients with congenitally missing upper lateral incisors, 36 patients treated with 54 Branemark (R) (Nobel Biocare AB, Goteborg, Sweden) implants and ISCs participated in the study. A clinical examination, California Dental Association (CDA) evaluation, and patient questionnaire were used to rate and compare the objective and subjective evaluations of the ISCs.

Results: The survival of implants and ISCs was 100%. The CDA ratings were satisfactory for all ISCs, with 70% being rated excellent. The patient rating was also high for the overall satisfaction item, with 21 being completely satisfied and 14 fairly satisfied. However, 12 patients wished for the replacement of their ISCs. Logistic regression analysis indicated that a less optimal embrasure fill was the most discriminating factor though not statistically significant (p = .082).

Conclusions: One-third of the patients wished for the replacement of their ISCs. Soft tissue adaptation seems to be an important factor for overall satisfaction.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wiley-Blackwell, 2015. Vol. 17, no 6, p. 1134-1140
Keywords [en]
agenesis, dental implants, dental papillae, follow-up, patient satisfaction
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-48194DOI: 10.1111/cid.12233ISI: 000368528600011PubMedID: 24853170Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84954421391OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-48194DiVA, id: diva2:902418
Available from: 2016-02-11 Created: 2016-02-11 Last updated: 2018-07-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Eliasson, AlfArnrup, Kristina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eliasson, AlfArnrup, KristinaBazargani, Farhan
By organisation
School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, SwedenÖrebro University Hospital
In the same journal
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf