oru.sePublikationer
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Logic of Communication in Competency Frameworks for Mathematics
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences. Dalarna university.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0386-1482
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-52113OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-52113DiVA: diva2:968062
Available from: 2016-09-12 Created: 2016-09-12 Last updated: 2017-10-17Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Knowledge and writing in school mathematics: a communicational approach
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Knowledge and writing in school mathematics: a communicational approach
2016 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis is about young students’ writing in school mathematics and the ways in which this writing is designed, interpreted and understood. Students’ communication can act as a source from which teachers can make inferences regarding students’ mathematical knowledge and understanding. In mathematics education previous research indicates that teachers assume that the process of interpreting and judging students’ writing is unproblematic. The relationship between what students’ write, and what they know or understand, is theoretical as well as empirical. In an era of increased focus on assessment and measurement in education it is necessary for teachers to know more about the relationship between communication and achievement. To add to this knowledge, the thesis has adopted a broad approach, and the thesis consists of four studies. The aim of these studies is to reach a deep understanding of writing in school mathematics. Such an understanding is dependent on examining different aspects of writing. The four studies together examine how the concept of communication is described in authoritative texts, how students’ writing is viewed by teachers and how students make use of different communicational resources in their writing. The results of the four studies indicate that students’ writing is more complex than is acknowledged by teachers and authoritative texts in mathematics education. Results point to a sophistication in students’ approach to the merging of the two functions of writing, writing for oneself and writing for others. Results also suggest that students attend, to various extents, to questions regarding how, what and for whom they are writing in school mathematics. The relationship between writing and achievement is dependent on students’ ability to have their writing reflect their knowledge and on teachers’ thorough knowledge of the different features of writing and their awareness of its complexity. From a communicational perspective the ability to communicate [in writing] in mathematics can and should be distinguished from other mathematical abilities. By acknowledging that mathematical communication integrates mathematical language and natural language, teachers have an opportunity to turn writing in mathematics into an object of learning. This offers teachers the potential to add to their assessment literacy and offers students the potential to develop their communicational ability in order to write in a way that better reflects their mathematical knowledge.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Örebro: Örebro university, 2016. 129 p.
Series
Örebro Studies in Education, ISSN 1404-9570 ; 53
Keyword
Mathematics, Writing, Students, Assessment, Communication
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Education
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-50798 (URN)978-91-7529-156-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2016-10-07, Högskolan Dalarna, F ö 6, Högskolegatan 2, Falun, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2016-06-14 Created: 2016-06-14 Last updated: 2017-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Teledahl, AnnaÖhman, Johan
By organisation
School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 228 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf